<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Q</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: MitchellO</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-385</link> <dc:creator>MitchellO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:37:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-385</guid> <description>You can get the dopod 838 Pro now from 3 Australia for $959 without contract. over $300 cheaper than Telstra!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get the dopod 838 Pro now from 3 Australia for $959 without contract. over $300 cheaper than Telstra!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mobilejenneth</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-236</link> <dc:creator>mobilejenneth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:31:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-236</guid> <description>I agree with the preferring a Pocket PC phone to a smartphone! I need POWER, as well as a largish screen. Minimal stylus use is good, but I like to have that option for times when I want to write a handwritten note, play Bejeweled or even select links on a Web page by just tapping on it rather than having to navigate to it using the D-Pad. Plus there&#039;s all the awesome programs available for the Pocket PC that are either cut-down for Smartphone or not available at all - such as Today plug-ins!
The Samsung i320 is the first time that I&#039;ve thought about &quot;switching&quot; though - such a sexy bit of hardware!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the preferring a Pocket PC phone to a smartphone! I need POWER, as well as a largish screen. Minimal stylus use is good, but I like to have that option for times when I want to write a handwritten note, play Bejeweled or even select links on a Web page by just tapping on it rather than having to navigate to it using the D-Pad. Plus there&#8217;s all the awesome programs available for the Pocket PC that are either cut-down for Smartphone or not available at all &#8211; such as Today plug-ins!</p><p>The Samsung i320 is the first time that I&#8217;ve thought about &#8220;switching&#8221; though &#8211; such a sexy bit of hardware!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-227</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-227</guid> <description>mcsouth, I already know that I prefer a Pocket PC Phone to a smartphone if it is going to also be my full-time PDA; I need stylus interaction with a full OS and all the Office goodies. :-P
It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t like Smartphone, it&#039;s just that I see it more as a part-time PDA / full-time phone solution. For instance, I would carry a Smartphone all the time in conjunction with something heavier that I might leave at home when traveling lightly - say a cPC or a JasJar. But that&#039;s just me, and we know that I can be a bit odd. It goes back to that Geeks that carry everything whether or not they need it syndrome. Ha ha! :-D
I agree that a lack of WiFi would be an issue, but I do like the hardware more than I thought I would.  :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mcsouth, I already know that I prefer a Pocket PC Phone to a smartphone if it is going to also be my full-time PDA; I need stylus interaction with a full OS and all the Office goodies. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t like Smartphone, it&#8217;s just that I see it more as a part-time PDA / full-time phone solution. For instance, I would carry a Smartphone all the time in conjunction with something heavier that I might leave at home when traveling lightly &#8211; say a cPC or a JasJar. But that&#8217;s just me, and we know that I can be a bit odd. It goes back to that Geeks that carry everything whether or not they need it syndrome. Ha ha! <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>I agree that a lack of WiFi would be an issue, but I do like the hardware more than I thought I would. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mcsouth</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-223</link> <dc:creator>mcsouth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-223</guid> <description>I agree about the lack of Wi-Fi being an issue. I was originally lusting after one of these when they first came out, but with no Wi-Fi, and because I&#039;m currently tied to Cingular (company plan), the Q was not an option.
I&#039;m curious to see which you prefer; the smartphone Q, or the PPC PE Dopod!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the lack of Wi-Fi being an issue. I was originally lusting after one of these when they first came out, but with no Wi-Fi, and because I&#8217;m currently tied to Cingular (company plan), the Q was not an option.</p><p>I&#8217;m curious to see which you prefer; the smartphone Q, or the PPC PE Dopod!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MitchellO</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-221</link> <dc:creator>MitchellO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-221</guid> <description>And BTW, the Q looks pretty nice :D No WiFi or 3G though :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And BTW, the Q looks pretty nice <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> No WiFi or 3G though <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MitchellO</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/06/q/#comment-220</link> <dc:creator>MitchellO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=75#comment-220</guid> <description>Yes $1299 is a pretty good price for the Hermes over here. I have to say I never would have thought the best price would be from Telstra!! I am waiting to see if the version that comes out on 3 (another carrier of ours) is cheaper. They are typically cheaper than the other carriers for phones. Just hoping I can afford one when they finally arrive! I want to Windows Mobile back so bad, UIQ3.0 is just not the same.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes $1299 is a pretty good price for the Hermes over here. I have to say I never would have thought the best price would be from Telstra!! I am waiting to see if the version that comes out on 3 (another carrier of ours) is cheaper. They are typically cheaper than the other carriers for phones. Just hoping I can afford one when they finally arrive! I want to Windows Mobile back so bad, UIQ3.0 is just not the same.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
