<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Message From DualCor&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-659</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-659</guid> <description>JK from jkOnTheRun just posted his thoughts on the situation, quoting heavily from this review:
http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/10/jkontherun_vapo.html#comments</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK from jkOnTheRun just posted his thoughts on the situation, quoting heavily from this review:</p><p><a
href="http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/10/jkontherun_vapo.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/10/jkontherun_vapo.html#comments</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve-chippy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-655</link> <dc:creator>steve-chippy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-655</guid> <description>Standby is difficult to measure. (I use the device everyday now!)
I should measure this as its a good point. I think we&#039;re talking max 36 hours standby so there&#039;s something to consider!
I&#039;ve been reading e-books on the Pepperpad (and doing a lot of browsing - its a really comfortable solution)
Standby on that is much better than most UMPCs as is battery life. (3 hours)
Regards
Steve.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standby is difficult to measure. (I use the device everyday now!)<br
/> I should measure this as its a good point. I think we&#8217;re talking max 36 hours standby so there&#8217;s something to consider!</p><p>I&#8217;ve been reading e-books on the Pepperpad (and doing a lot of browsing &#8211; its a really comfortable solution)<br
/> Standby on that is much better than most UMPCs as is battery life. (3 hours)</p><p>Regards<br
/> Steve.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-617</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:43:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-617</guid> <description>&quot;XP takes 5 seconds to start up on my UMPC. Suspend mode works perfectly. Why would I need to reboot it every time? The Vega takes 6 seconds as I recall. I probably soft-boot my PocketPC after less usage hours than my UMPC come to think of it.&quot;
Ah okay, that&#039;s what I was wondering. I don&#039;t really use a suspend mode on the cPC because 80% of the time I am using the PPC side. I&#039;ll boot XP, get what I needed, and then turn it off - hence the &gt;minute boot time. Of course, if XP is still on and I am in the PPC side, switching over is instantaneous.
Bear in mind that I like to read eBooks...a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt;. Which means I am holding the device in my hand for long periods of time. If the device is in XP and it&#039;s hot, that won&#039;t be much fun.
So just out of curiosity, how is battery life when your UMPC is in suspend mode? Can it make it the whole day? Days?
I agree with you about the sea of UMPCs...I can&#039;t wait to see what 2007 and 2008 will bring. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;XP takes 5 seconds to start up on my UMPC. Suspend mode works perfectly. Why would I need to reboot it every time? The Vega takes 6 seconds as I recall. I probably soft-boot my PocketPC after less usage hours than my UMPC come to think of it.&#8221;</p><p>Ah okay, that&#8217;s what I was wondering. I don&#8217;t really use a suspend mode on the cPC because 80% of the time I am using the PPC side. I&#8217;ll boot XP, get what I needed, and then turn it off &#8211; hence the >minute boot time. Of course, if XP is still on and I am in the PPC side, switching over is instantaneous.</p><p>Bear in mind that I like to read eBooks&#8230;a <em>lot</em>. Which means I am holding the device in my hand for long periods of time. If the device is in XP and it&#8217;s hot, that won&#8217;t be much fun.</p><p>So just out of curiosity, how is battery life when your UMPC is in suspend mode? Can it make it the whole day? Days?</p><p>I agree with you about the sea of UMPCs&#8230;I can&#8217;t wait to see what 2007 and 2008 will bring. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve-chippy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-616</link> <dc:creator>steve-chippy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-616</guid> <description>Hi.
I&#039;ll give you the heat issue. You could probably watch a 320x240 1.2mbps video on the pocketpc side of things without  heat build-up.
XP takes 5 seconds to start up on my UMPC. Suspend mode works perfectly. Why would I need to reboot it every time? The Vega takes 6 seconds as I recall. I probably soft-boot my PocketPC after less usage hours than my UMPC come to think of it.
I guess if they hit the right target market and can keep the margins high enough it could work. I mean its not as if it&#039;s being launched into a sea of UMPCs (unless they wait another year!)
Steve
Carrypad.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p><p>I&#8217;ll give you the heat issue. You could probably watch a 320&#215;240 1.2mbps video on the pocketpc side of things without  heat build-up.</p><p>XP takes 5 seconds to start up on my UMPC. Suspend mode works perfectly. Why would I need to reboot it every time? The Vega takes 6 seconds as I recall. I probably soft-boot my PocketPC after less usage hours than my UMPC come to think of it.</p><p>I guess if they hit the right target market and can keep the margins high enough it could work. I mean its not as if it&#8217;s being launched into a sea of UMPCs (unless they wait another year!)</p><p>Steve<br
/> Carrypad.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-614</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-614</guid> <description>Steve it&#039;s fine. :-)
Let me ask you a couple of questions:
When using a UMPC, do they get very warm? (i.e. warmer than a PDA does)
What&#039;s the start-up time?
You had mentioned &quot;saving 4 seconds switch-on time?&quot;, but it is actually closer to a full minute. WM5 starts &lt;em&gt;instantly&lt;/em&gt;, just like on any Pocket PC; it&#039;s only the XP side that takes a while to come on, so I was just wondering. :-)
In any case: I believe that the market is big enough for all types of devices, and that having more options available means consumers will be able to make more personal need or desire-driven choices. Perhaps some ground may have been lost by DualCor, but I don&#039;t believe that they haven&#039;t got a place in the micro Tablet PC/UMPC market. I think the more the merrier, because it means more for me to choose from.
Thanks for the conversation. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve it&#8217;s fine. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Let me ask you a couple of questions:</p><p>When using a UMPC, do they get very warm? (i.e. warmer than a PDA does)</p><p>What&#8217;s the start-up time?</p><p>You had mentioned &#8220;saving 4 seconds switch-on time?&#8221;, but it is actually closer to a full minute. WM5 starts <em>instantly</em>, just like on any Pocket PC; it&#8217;s only the XP side that takes a while to come on, so I was just wondering. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>In any case: I believe that the market is big enough for all types of devices, and that having more options available means consumers will be able to make more personal need or desire-driven choices. Perhaps some ground may have been lost by DualCor, but I don&#8217;t believe that they haven&#8217;t got a place in the micro Tablet PC/UMPC market. I think the more the merrier, because it means more for me to choose from.</p><p>Thanks for the conversation. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve-chippy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-610</link> <dc:creator>steve-chippy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:28:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-610</guid> <description>Hi Judie.
Thanks for the answer.
&quot;has been exactly what I needed at times&quot;, &quot;massively improved battery life&quot; and &quot;I have a 5? screen and the difference in what I see is amazing&quot; sums it up.
It battery life can be improved on a 5&quot; UMPC, why would you need a Dualcor?
SOrry to keep going on about this but I really believe that they are losing too much ground now. The 4.5 hour 4.2&quot; Vega is here and DualCor need a new USP.
Steve.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judie.</p><p>Thanks for the answer.</p><p>&#8220;has been exactly what I needed at times&#8221;, &#8220;massively improved battery life&#8221; and &#8220;I have a 5? screen and the difference in what I see is amazing&#8221; sums it up.</p><p>It battery life can be improved on a 5&#8243; UMPC, why would you need a Dualcor?</p><p>SOrry to keep going on about this but I really believe that they are losing too much ground now. The 4.5 hour 4.2&#8243; Vega is here and DualCor need a new USP.</p><p>Steve.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TPN :: The TabletPC Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tablet PC Show #48</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-604</link> <dc:creator>TPN :: The TabletPC Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tablet PC Show #48</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:34:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-604</guid> <description>[...] DualCor talks to Judie Hughes of GearDiary.com about the next version of their device, but where is their first version? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DualCor talks to Judie Hughes of GearDiary.com about the next version of their device, but where is their first version? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-599</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:42:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-599</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What needs ‘profile’ is it that you think matches the DualCor?&#8221;<br
/> That&#8217;s not something I would even hazard to guess. I just know that for me, being able to switch between the two operating systems has been exactly what I needed at times.</p><p>&#8220;Is there something that better on a PocketPC than on WIndows XP/Vista except saving 4 seconds switch-on time?&#8221;<br
/> Yes, there is massively improved battery life when using functions that can be done on the less battery &#8211; hungry WM5 side of the device&#8230;such as reading eBooks or working in mobile Office programs.</p><p>&#8220;Wouldn’t you prefer your PocketPC integrated onto your phone? (WM5 Smartphone.)&#8221;<br
/> I have that now with my JasJar. It&#8217;s nice, but no &#8211; I don&#8217;t prefer it. For one thing, the screen on the cPC completely spoils you &#8211; especially when in WM5. While the average PPC Phone is sporting a 2.8&#8243; screen, I have a 5&#8243; screen and the difference in what I see is amazing. Although the JasJar&#8217;s nearly 4&#8243; screen is great, it doesn&#8217;t even approach this visibility level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve-chippy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-598</link> <dc:creator>steve-chippy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:03:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-598</guid> <description>Judie.
You said &quot;I believe in the cPC because once it has built-in WiFi and BT, it will be near perfect for my needs.&quot;
What needs &#039;profile&#039; is it that you think matches the DualCor?
Is there something that better on a PocketPC than on WIndows XP/Vista except saving 4 seconds switch-on time? Wouldn&#039;t you prefer your PocketPC integrated onto your phone? (WM5 Smartphone.)
Steve.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judie.</p><p>You said &#8220;I believe in the cPC because once it has built-in WiFi and BT, it will be near perfect for my needs.&#8221;</p><p>What needs &#8216;profile&#8217; is it that you think matches the DualCor?</p><p>Is there something that better on a PocketPC than on WIndows XP/Vista except saving 4 seconds switch-on time? Wouldn&#8217;t you prefer your PocketPC integrated onto your phone? (WM5 Smartphone.)</p><p>Steve.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dougom</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-592</link> <dc:creator>dougom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-592</guid> <description>Despite the usual corporate flim-flammery that any CEO or COO would engage in, I think that  Rob Howe has (and alludes to) a valid point:  the mobile computing realm is still very much in flux, and how these devices will be used is definitely an open issue.  dualCor, it is clear, is giving themselves the space via their design to have users create plenty of potential market areas for their product.
At the risk of sounding like a marketing droid myself, mobile computing is in its infancy, and anyone who says they &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; how these Origami/UMPC/convergent devices will be used is really deluding themselves.  I have my own ideas, of course (I think a hand-sized device with a laptop-sized amount of computing power, that you can unplug from your docking station and take on the road would be invaluable, but that&#039;s just &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; take), and I&#039;m sure Mike does, and Judy, and Rob Howe, and Bill Gates, and you-name-it.  But to quote Neal Stephenson, &quot;You may have envisioned half a dozen potential markets for your product, but as soon as you open your doors, one just explodes from the pack and becomes so instantly important that good business sense dictates that you abandon the others and concentrate all your efforts.&quot;  I personally don&#039;t think dualCor is being unreasonable in the way they are proceeding; I&#039;m sure their hoping that some application (real-world application, I mean; not software application) will make this device invaluable to some segment of the market.
On the flip side, yeah, they&#039;re really late.  And they&#039;re going to miss the Christmas season.  And their web site is really really out of date.  And they haven&#039;t done a demo or a roadshow or gone to a trade show in a long long time, so far as I can tell.  So it&#039;s possible that, no matter how good their device is, they will (or maybe already have) miss their window.
But they&#039;ve made a bet that customers will find a valuable use for having both WM and Windows XP (or Vista) on the same device.  And maybe they&#039;re going to be proved right.  All &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; know is that I wish &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; had an evaluation copy.
Just my own thoughts, of course.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the usual corporate flim-flammery that any CEO or COO would engage in, I think that  Rob Howe has (and alludes to) a valid point:  the mobile computing realm is still very much in flux, and how these devices will be used is definitely an open issue.  dualCor, it is clear, is giving themselves the space via their design to have users create plenty of potential market areas for their product.</p><p>At the risk of sounding like a marketing droid myself, mobile computing is in its infancy, and anyone who says they <i>know</i> how these Origami/UMPC/convergent devices will be used is really deluding themselves.  I have my own ideas, of course (I think a hand-sized device with a laptop-sized amount of computing power, that you can unplug from your docking station and take on the road would be invaluable, but that&#8217;s just <i>my</i> take), and I&#8217;m sure Mike does, and Judy, and Rob Howe, and Bill Gates, and you-name-it.  But to quote Neal Stephenson, &#8220;You may have envisioned half a dozen potential markets for your product, but as soon as you open your doors, one just explodes from the pack and becomes so instantly important that good business sense dictates that you abandon the others and concentrate all your efforts.&#8221;  I personally don&#8217;t think dualCor is being unreasonable in the way they are proceeding; I&#8217;m sure their hoping that some application (real-world application, I mean; not software application) will make this device invaluable to some segment of the market.</p><p>On the flip side, yeah, they&#8217;re really late.  And they&#8217;re going to miss the Christmas season.  And their web site is really really out of date.  And they haven&#8217;t done a demo or a roadshow or gone to a trade show in a long long time, so far as I can tell.  So it&#8217;s possible that, no matter how good their device is, they will (or maybe already have) miss their window.</p><p>But they&#8217;ve made a bet that customers will find a valuable use for having both WM and Windows XP (or Vista) on the same device.  And maybe they&#8217;re going to be proved right.  All <i>I</i> know is that I wish <i>I</i> had an evaluation copy.</p><p>Just my own thoughts, of course.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-588</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-588</guid> <description>mikel, thanks for the apology. It is accepted and much appreciated. :-)
Now...what makes you think that this was a one shot deal for any of us to get answers? The way I see it, a dialogue has been opened and as long as we all talk in calm tones, we may get replies.
I suspect that what might have happened between CES 2006 and today is that there may have been promises made when things looked a certain way, but perhaps things didn&#039;t go as planned. It happens... :neutral:
Reading what Rob said about needing a lead investor shows me that they have a product that is ready to get off the ground if the right person will fund it. The fact that I have one in my hand shows that it is not vaporware, it&#039;s just not finished or mass-produced at the moment.
I believe in the cPC because once it has built-in WiFi and BT, it will be near perfect for my needs. If it has the capability to add various plug-in radios &quot;under a sliding screen&quot; as Rob alluded to...wow. The technology he&#039;s talking about is impressive and evidently it will be feasible if the right person will step forward to make it happen.
Where are Paul Allen or Bill Gates when we need them? ;-)
Rather than bash DualCor for trying to get the word out about the cPC - yes, perhaps a bit too early, I would like to commend their innovation and talk about the possibilities until this device that I want sees the light of day.
I would like to think that a consumer cPC will become available sometime during the next year. I can wait, even if it is a bit impatiently. :-P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mikel, thanks for the apology. It is accepted and much appreciated. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Now&#8230;what makes you think that this was a one shot deal for any of us to get answers? The way I see it, a dialogue has been opened and as long as we all talk in calm tones, we may get replies.</p><p>I suspect that what might have happened between CES 2006 and today is that there may have been promises made when things looked a certain way, but perhaps things didn&#8217;t go as planned. It happens&#8230; <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':neutral:' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Reading what Rob said about needing a lead investor shows me that they have a product that is ready to get off the ground if the right person will fund it. The fact that I have one in my hand shows that it is not vaporware, it&#8217;s just not finished or mass-produced at the moment.</p><p>I believe in the cPC because once it has built-in WiFi and BT, it will be near perfect for my needs. If it has the capability to add various plug-in radios &#8220;under a sliding screen&#8221; as Rob alluded to&#8230;wow. The technology he&#8217;s talking about is impressive and evidently it will be feasible if the right person will step forward to make it happen.</p><p>Where are Paul Allen or Bill Gates when we need them? <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Rather than bash DualCor for trying to get the word out about the cPC &#8211; yes, perhaps a bit too early, I would like to commend their innovation and talk about the possibilities until this device that I want sees the light of day.</p><p>I would like to think that a consumer cPC will become available sometime during the next year. I can wait, even if it is a bit impatiently. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mikelaaron</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-587</link> <dc:creator>mikelaaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:32:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-587</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry i seemed a bit harsh-
It&#039;s just that nothing has changed with DualCor yet- no updated press releases (other than the annoucement of personnel changes)- the most we heard from dulacor was due to Dave at mobility-today, and then he abruptly left the board.
I had called and emailed Dualcor, not with any other request than- &quot;could you please provide an update as to the status of the cPc&quot;- exactly those words.
Never received an answer.  Their phones weren&#039;t even working for a while (it was my question, regarding their status, to gottabemobile.com that got a a phone interview).
They seemed none too proud to show off their product almost a year ago, and then on the day they were to &quot;release&quot; the product, they instead &quot;announced&quot; that there was going to be a developer program.
I understand why you asked the questions you did- and i&#039;m not suggesting (although my language may have shown otherwise) that the interview needs to turn into a name-calling match or a fist fight... it would just be nice to hear some real answers.
You got a prototype and a chance to get the interview that everyone would have liked to get-
it would have been nice to get some hard answers regarding what happened between CES 2006 and today,  and what is the likelyhood that any of us non-industry types will ever get to purchase one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry i seemed a bit harsh-<br
/> It&#8217;s just that nothing has changed with DualCor yet- no updated press releases (other than the annoucement of personnel changes)- the most we heard from dulacor was due to Dave at mobility-today, and then he abruptly left the board.<br
/> I had called and emailed Dualcor, not with any other request than- &#8220;could you please provide an update as to the status of the cPc&#8221;- exactly those words.</p><p>Never received an answer.  Their phones weren&#8217;t even working for a while (it was my question, regarding their status, to gottabemobile.com that got a a phone interview).</p><p>They seemed none too proud to show off their product almost a year ago, and then on the day they were to &#8220;release&#8221; the product, they instead &#8220;announced&#8221; that there was going to be a developer program.</p><p>I understand why you asked the questions you did- and i&#8217;m not suggesting (although my language may have shown otherwise) that the interview needs to turn into a name-calling match or a fist fight&#8230; it would just be nice to hear some real answers.</p><p>You got a prototype and a chance to get the interview that everyone would have liked to get-<br
/> it would have been nice to get some hard answers regarding what happened between CES 2006 and today,  and what is the likelyhood that any of us non-industry types will ever get to purchase one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-586</link> <dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-586</guid> <description>Well mikelaaron, this was my interview so I asked what I wanted to know. I guess I don&#039;t feel the frustration and anger that you do, but I understand what you are feeling.
There is always the possibility that if you post a respectfully worded question to Rob, he might answer. Antagonistic vitriol is not usually the way to get a polite response, though.
You posted the same comment both here and on Pocket PC Thoughts, so you evidently are worried that your voice won&#039;t be &quot;heard&quot;. I hear you. I don&#039;t particularly agree with you, but I hear you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well mikelaaron, this was my interview so I asked what I wanted to know. I guess I don&#8217;t feel the frustration and anger that you do, but I understand what you are feeling.</p><p>There is always the possibility that if you post a respectfully worded question to Rob, he might answer. Antagonistic vitriol is not usually the way to get a polite response, though.</p><p>You posted the same comment both here and on Pocket PC Thoughts, so you evidently are worried that your voice won&#8217;t be &#8220;heard&#8221;. I hear you. I don&#8217;t particularly agree with you, but I hear you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Just Another Mobile Monday &#187; More News on The DualCor cPC Hybrid UMPC at Gear Diary</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-582</link> <dc:creator>Just Another Mobile Monday &#187; More News on The DualCor cPC Hybrid UMPC at Gear Diary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-582</guid> <description>[...] A Message from DualCor &#8230; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Message from DualCor &#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve-chippy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-581</link> <dc:creator>steve-chippy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-581</guid> <description>Interesting article. I&#039;ve read a lot between the lines there.
The &#039;core proposition&#039; (creating a kind of ACPI, control and data bus between low and high power computers that share preipherals.) is quite a nice idea of course. I&#039;d love to share a disk, screen, loudspeakers, network from my UMPC to my smartphone. I can use my smartphone as a control device and leave my UMPC in a bag. The problem with cPC is that you are forced to have a pocket PC (The DualCor doesn&#039;t have cellular radio right?) locked into the same casing as a UMPC. That negates many of the reasons for sharing resources in the first place and doesn&#039;t solve any of the problems of sharing resources onto a Smartphone. You end up with three devices to look after. Now if they had developed a wireless way of doing this, a kind of advanced UPnP or clustered parallel BIOS, then I could keep my smartphone in my pocket and my UMPC in my bag. That would make for a very valuable IP.
The other advantage of this core proposition is battery life but in 18months, this problem will be solved anyway. We already have 4 hour UMPCs (Samsung Q1b, Raon Digital Vega) so its been proved that you don&#039;t really need to hard-control a UMPC to achieve useable battery life.
Their core proposition doesn&#039;t have much of a useable life in my opinion. In fact, I think they&#039;ve just wasted 30% of the value of it in their one-year delay.
Regards
Steve.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I&#8217;ve read a lot between the lines there.</p><p>The &#8216;core proposition&#8217; (creating a kind of ACPI, control and data bus between low and high power computers that share preipherals.) is quite a nice idea of course. I&#8217;d love to share a disk, screen, loudspeakers, network from my UMPC to my smartphone. I can use my smartphone as a control device and leave my UMPC in a bag. The problem with cPC is that you are forced to have a pocket PC (The DualCor doesn&#8217;t have cellular radio right?) locked into the same casing as a UMPC. That negates many of the reasons for sharing resources in the first place and doesn&#8217;t solve any of the problems of sharing resources onto a Smartphone. You end up with three devices to look after. Now if they had developed a wireless way of doing this, a kind of advanced UPnP or clustered parallel BIOS, then I could keep my smartphone in my pocket and my UMPC in my bag. That would make for a very valuable IP.</p><p>The other advantage of this core proposition is battery life but in 18months, this problem will be solved anyway. We already have 4 hour UMPCs (Samsung Q1b, Raon Digital Vega) so its been proved that you don&#8217;t really need to hard-control a UMPC to achieve useable battery life.</p><p>Their core proposition doesn&#8217;t have much of a useable life in my opinion. In fact, I think they&#8217;ve just wasted 30% of the value of it in their one-year delay.</p><p>Regards<br
/> Steve.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GottaBeMobile.com - Gear Diary Clears Up Some DualCor cPC Questions - Your Tablet PC and Ultra-Mobile PC news source</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-580</link> <dc:creator>GottaBeMobile.com - Gear Diary Clears Up Some DualCor cPC Questions - Your Tablet PC and Ultra-Mobile PC news source</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-580</guid> <description>[...] The DualCor cPC has certainly been a subject of much talk. Word of the device it like gangbusters last January (or was it December?) and the dual processor device intrigued quite a few mobile warriors. Who wouldn&#8217;t be interested in a device that could run both XP and Windows Mobile? But the DualCor cPC has also been the subject of delays, rumors, and just some bad PR handling. The last big rumor was that version one was being canned and DualCor was moving on to version two. Judie at Gear Diary recently interviewed DualCor CEO Rob Howe to get the straight dope and has published the resulting email. Here&#8217;s an excerpt: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The DualCor cPC has certainly been a subject of much talk. Word of the device it like gangbusters last January (or was it December?) and the dual processor device intrigued quite a few mobile warriors. Who wouldn&rsquo;t be interested in a device that could run both XP and Windows Mobile? But the DualCor cPC has also been the subject of delays, rumors, and just some bad PR handling. The last big rumor was that version one was being canned and DualCor was moving on to version two. Judie at Gear Diary recently interviewed DualCor CEO Rob Howe to get the straight dope and has published the resulting email. Here&rsquo;s an excerpt: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allen Hong</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-579</link> <dc:creator>Allen Hong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:33:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-579</guid> <description>:S  I still want one! When can I plunk down my hard earned bucks???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:S  I still want one! When can I plunk down my hard earned bucks???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mikelaaron</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2006/10/24/a-message-from-dualcor/#comment-578</link> <dc:creator>mikelaaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://geardiary.com/?p=359#comment-578</guid> <description>What a bad interview-
You know- we finally get a chance to put DualCor on the spot and all the interviewer does (yes, i know who she is and that all the tech blogs love her) is ask leading questions- and fluff ones at that.
What about bringing DualCor to task for missing the launch by a whole year? What about nailing them for their deceptive marketing on their website (Dualcor is better than a UMPC? UMPC&#039;s have launched and can be bought, my friend).
Just makes me mad- they were ready to change the world, put OQO in it&#039;s place, remap the mobile workforce. And then, nothing.
Here was the opportunity to ask the hard questions, not get them to read from their marketing and investment brochure.
Shame on you Judie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bad interview-</p><p>You know- we finally get a chance to put DualCor on the spot and all the interviewer does (yes, i know who she is and that all the tech blogs love her) is ask leading questions- and fluff ones at that.</p><p>What about bringing DualCor to task for missing the launch by a whole year? What about nailing them for their deceptive marketing on their website (Dualcor is better than a UMPC? UMPC&#8217;s have launched and can be bought, my friend).</p><p>Just makes me mad- they were ready to change the world, put OQO in it&#8217;s place, remap the mobile workforce. And then, nothing.</p><p>Here was the opportunity to ask the hard questions, not get them to read from their marketing and investment brochure.</p><p>Shame on you Judie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
