<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New iPhone, MacBook, MacBook Pro Images Debated At MacRumors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/04/17/new-iphone-macbook-macbook-pro-images-debated-at-macrumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/04/17/new-iphone-macbook-macbook-pro-images-debated-at-macrumors/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: JDTagish</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/04/17/new-iphone-macbook-macbook-pro-images-debated-at-macrumors/#comment-33057</link> <dc:creator>JDTagish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:20:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=6779#comment-33057</guid> <description>They&#039;ve confirmed them as fake now - FYI.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve confirmed them as fake now &#8211; FYI.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/04/17/new-iphone-macbook-macbook-pro-images-debated-at-macrumors/#comment-32957</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=6779#comment-32957</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sold that these are the real thing. Though people at MacRumors were debating it (most doubted the authenticity), quite a few of them were of the opinion that while the photos probably were not real that they were pretty close to what they thought about the direction of the products.
I was doubtful about the 32GB iPhone pictured on the site.
If Apple is going to do a push into corporate America I&#039;m expecting them to drop the camera and offer an extended battery. Neither of which I&#039;ve seen in any &quot;spy&quot; photos as of yet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sold that these are the real thing. Though people at MacRumors were debating it (most doubted the authenticity), quite a few of them were of the opinion that while the photos probably were not real that they were pretty close to what they thought about the direction of the products.</p><p>I was doubtful about the 32GB iPhone pictured on the site.</p><p>If Apple is going to do a push into corporate America I&#8217;m expecting them to drop the camera and offer an extended battery. Neither of which I&#8217;ve seen in any &#8220;spy&#8221; photos as of yet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kismet</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/04/17/new-iphone-macbook-macbook-pro-images-debated-at-macrumors/#comment-32952</link> <dc:creator>Kismet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=6779#comment-32952</guid> <description>Judging by all the space on both sides of the keyboard and the smaller bezel on the screen, it&#039;s way too big to be the Macbook.  Looks more like a colored Macbook Pro.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by all the space on both sides of the keyboard and the smaller bezel on the screen, it&#8217;s way too big to be the Macbook.  Looks more like a colored Macbook Pro.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
