Posted on 22 April 2008, at 8:16 pm, by Christopher Spera
So is it truly about the EULA, Apple wanting control, or is it something else entirely?
Over the last couple of weeks, there’s been a lot of press about Psystar, the web-based organization who has defied all speculation that it was a fly-by-night scam artist. The company emphatically insists that it’s a legitimate business who simply had payment processing issues to overcome regarding its highly publicized Mac clone/compatible PC’s. According to a post on its home page, http://www.psystar.com/, their online store is back up, in business; and orders placed during the week of 07-Apr-08 are currently shipping.
While I’m not going to get into the debate over whether or not the PC’s that are shipping from Psystar are legally able to run Apple’s OSX Leopard, its very clear that the components they are using are definitely Leopard compatible. The PC’s themselves are WAY cheaper than even an entry-level Mac Mini, which starts at $499. Psystar’s entry level box, the Open Computer, has decent specs for the price (Core2Duo 2.2 gHz, 250GB, 2GB RAM), but no OS. The company will sell you a Leopard license and install the OS for $155. Apple’s EULA (end user license agreement) forbids the installation of the OS on any other machine, except those manufactured by Apple…hence the controversy.
My big thought on all of this really comes at the situation from a different angle: The entire Mac/Apple experience. Is it truly the combination of hardware and software that makes the relationship work; or will any port in a storm do?
I bought a MacBook Pro, installed Leopard, installed Vista Ultimate, and have the full blown experience. The problem here is that the entire financial commitment for my rig is approximately $2600USD. That’s $2000 more than you’d spend on Psystar’s entry level rig ($1600 more than their Pro rig), and you’d get the same experience, right..? Right..?
That’s the question that many end users are asking themselves…will the experience be the same, will it be as good (or at least comparable) as the original? I’m interested in finding out the answers to those questions. As an owner of a MacBook Pro, I can truly state that the hardware is by far what initially attracted me to Apple. At 1 inch thick, with a 15 inch wide, glossy screen capable of displaying HD video, upgradable to 4GB of RAM, I honestly bought my MBP to be a Windows laptop. It’s truly an awesome machine, and works well, even as a dedicated Windows box.
For me, it WAS all about the hardware. The fact that I get to run more than one OS on it, where I can really work photos, video and music with some really nice, native tools, was a huge bonus (and one I chased after for my iPod. I reformatted it and now sync it as a Mac device).
All Apple components work well together. It’s completely seamless. It all just works…just like you would expect from a complete solution. Apple hasn’t formally responded to all of this yet; at least, not that I’ve heard. But if they do, I would love to know what they think. They initially allowed something like this back in the day (a la the Lisa), but it didn’t last long.
Most of the big pundits that I’ve either spoken to, listened to, or read have all said that it’s just a matter of time before Apple slams the EULA hounds on Psystar and the store takes another nap. Everyone is saying that the issue is about Apple controlling their complete experience, and access to their OS on their machines. To an extent, it’s true, but let’s take a deeper look…
As all of the components aren’t specifically rated to work on OSX, many users will likely have to rely on the good graces of the open source community for compatible drivers, if native ones don’t or won’t work. While I’m certain the community is up to the challenge, I wonder if it’s truly mature enough to be able to handle that level of support, in light of Apple’s (likely) action to enforce their EULA. I know the flesh is willing…
It will be interesting to see how Mac purists, switchers and the Mac curious react to all of this. I’d love to see some kind of sales figures from Psystar. It might go a long way in encouraging Apple to either review/rewrite their EULA; or to lower the premium threshold on all of their device and hardware prices. It took me well over a year to save for my MBP, and while I think it was a good buy, the cost was very steep and I have yet full realize the full ROI on the purchase.
I would love to be able to purchase a MacBook for my daughter. It could see her through high school as well as into college, but currently the price point is just too high. If Psystar were to come out with a notebook that could run Leopard, they might snare yet another purchase from me…
What about everyone else? What are your thoughts on all of this? I’d love to hear what you have to say in the discussion area. Why not join in and let us know your thoughts?
April 22nd, 2008 at 1:47 pm
Well, I think Apple has been making alot of mistakes since switching to Intel. The PowerPC platform deserved a price differential because it WAS more expensive than Intel. Now they are trying to use the same ole pricing on Intel based machines and that doesn’t wash anymore. Also, how in the world would their current EULA stand up? If they are worried about supporting it, they shouldn’t be. They didn’t make the clone….Psystar did. Ergo, why would I be calling Apple about it if I have an issue??
I am also really disappointed that the Air isn’t a ultra cheap machine. Apple needs a cheaper machine. The Mac Mini ain’t as cheap anymore when you compare it to the prices of machines like the gPC. Sure, it’s more machine than a gPC, but it’s probably going to have a similar usage pattern.
I think Apple better come up with something in the ultra low cost realm quick as these machines are getting more capable and cheaper every day.
April 22nd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Chris I’ve been following this whole Mac clone story (as has most of the web) and I’m very concerned about whether this is even a legitimate company.
The old saying “if it sounds too good…” is repeatedly ringing in my head.
Until I see photos and a review up at a reputable web site - I’m totally reserving any judgement on this at all..
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:06 pm
One question I have….if they ar efor real, where are the review units?
April 23rd, 2008 at 3:41 am
Many of my friends have remarked at the price I paid for my MacBook Pro. “Oh you could have got a much better machine is you hadn’t bought a Maaaaaaaac”.
Honestly, I am very pleased with my decision. I get a solid OS that crashes very infrequently, everything just works seemlessly together so I spend less time trying to fix problems, and I also get fantastic hardware that is uber-thin and looks amazing.
Might cost more than a similar Dell, but the Dell would be twice as thick and look like it belongs in a cubical.
April 23rd, 2008 at 9:58 am
You know, I read something recently (and I may have mentioned this before) that indicated that Macs really aren’t all that much more. I believe the average Apple desktop - for like configured equipment - was about 16% more and laptop was only 9% more.
I think the big difference is that Apple doesn’t offer a $500 notebook, for example, so it looks like everything is much more expensive than it really is. The mini is just fine when compared to similarly configured machines, but even the mini isn’t really at the low-end of the device scale - pricewise or configuration-wise.
Personally, I think it would be bad for Apple to try to offer lower-end product - just like it was bad for Mercedes to think it would acquire Chrysler to gain low-end market share. They have a reputation for solid product and they want to protect that. Additionally, their marketshare continues to grow despite not having a truly low-end machine.
In the low end of the market you make less on the equipment and your support costs (and likelihood of requiring support) go up. It can become like the guys who made widgets at a cost of $1 a piece, sold them for 99 cents each but planned to make up the difference in volume. I’m not sure those extra sales are worth it. If I were Apple, I’d just keep moving forward with their current rep as a premium player.
I also think that Apple is correct in resisting a clone market. People think it’s because Apple doesn’t want to open things up, but I think it’s really for the same reasons I mention above. If you allow or even encourage a clone market openly, then you are also owning some of the support issues/costs. I don’t think that is in Apple’s best interest or really anyone’s interest. You will trade stability for price.
There is a counter-argument states that the open-source nature of the underpinnings will allow for better support, but open-source projects only work well when there is strong support for the project (like Firefox or OpenOffice, or some of the bigger Linux offerings). They work less well when the project is only a niche, like a Linux driver for a specific off-brand model of DVD player. In that case, you tend to be reliant on the commercial market for your answers. I’m afraid this is more of a niche market and will suffer from support issues as people try to buy these boxes, leaving a bad taste that people will likely blame Apple for, because most people won’t understand that it’s not Apple’s support issue.
So I really don’t see the clone market as being a positive thing, lower prices or no.
April 23rd, 2008 at 10:58 am
Actually 5 years ago when I got my PowerBook, it was the cheapest notebook computer with firewire. I compared it to the notebooks and in each case, the wintel solution cost more. PLUS I can’t believe that Compaq, HP, Dell and Gateway are still using dual core Pentiums vs the Core Duo or Core 2 Duo. Sure, they are dual core machines, but they are just not the same as the COre 2 chipset. Granted, they DO provide cheap machines and they are fine for what most people will buy them for.
One thing I can’t believe is one podcast I listen to actually said he hated the screen and the keyboard on all Macs. I have never heard someone say stuff that negative about a Apple product unless they were staunch open source or anti DRM guys. I have always been impressed by the Apple Hardware. It’s built to take a beating plus Apple doesn’t do asinine things like have a “Consumer” line and a “Business” line.