<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dash Express GPS Review: Three Words- Bulky, Buggy, Beta</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/05/02/dash-express-gps-review-three-words-bulky-buggy-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/05/02/dash-express-gps-review-three-words-bulky-buggy-beta/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: mchinsky</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/05/02/dash-express-gps-review-three-words-bulky-buggy-beta/#comment-35057</link> <dc:creator>mchinsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:03:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=7302#comment-35057</guid> <description>I do think, whether this is the device or not, this concept is the future and all new GPS&#039;s will work this way in 36 months.
The hope is the big guys can &quot;share&quot; their data and realizing that working together is better than trying to be the winner, otherwise we&#039;ll have a &quot;bluray vs HDDVD&quot; situation which will slow down mass adoption years.
Assuming they can fix routing algorithms, shrink the hardware a bit, it seems that if there were a few hundred of these in Wayne&#039;s region, it would have been killer.  So the issue is to see if they can get enough early adopters out there.
I do feel, if they were smart, they would give them away for hardware cost and no data fees to the first 20,000 users or something to seed the market and get PR.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think, whether this is the device or not, this concept is the future and all new GPS&#8217;s will work this way in 36 months.</p><p>The hope is the big guys can &#8220;share&#8221; their data and realizing that working together is better than trying to be the winner, otherwise we&#8217;ll have a &#8220;bluray vs HDDVD&#8221; situation which will slow down mass adoption years.</p><p>Assuming they can fix routing algorithms, shrink the hardware a bit, it seems that if there were a few hundred of these in Wayne&#8217;s region, it would have been killer.  So the issue is to see if they can get enough early adopters out there.</p><p>I do feel, if they were smart, they would give them away for hardware cost and no data fees to the first 20,000 users or something to seed the market and get PR.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/05/02/dash-express-gps-review-three-words-bulky-buggy-beta/#comment-34990</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=7302#comment-34990</guid> <description>It is my opinion that this thing is a lot of hype.
I noticed the routing and the speed that you mention.
Really, the only reason I can think of that the other sites were fawning over this is that they never used a GPS in their car before.
As a beta I think it&#039;s ok -- but sheez -- for $399 and a month fee? No thanks.
Anyone want to buy a slightly used Dash Express? :-)
Maybe I&#039;ll give it away if I can figure out how to unlock my name form the unit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my opinion that this thing is a lot of hype.</p><p>I noticed the routing and the speed that you mention.</p><p>Really, the only reason I can think of that the other sites were fawning over this is that they never used a GPS in their car before.</p><p>As a beta I think it&#8217;s ok &#8212; but sheez &#8212; for $399 and a month fee? No thanks.</p><p>Anyone want to buy a slightly used Dash Express? <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Maybe I&#8217;ll give it away if I can figure out how to unlock my name form the unit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/05/02/dash-express-gps-review-three-words-bulky-buggy-beta/#comment-34987</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=7302#comment-34987</guid> <description>I&#039;ve done more than a few GPS / Navigation reviews over the years (including for one of the bigger GPS-related sites) and people have been extremely excited about this product.  I&#039;ve been a little less excited about this product.  Here&#039;s why:
1) The device requires ongoing payments of at least $10/month to be useful.  I&quot;m not sure I want to pay that much for just traffic info when I can get full satellite radio, which includes traffic info for just a couple of bucks more.  How about a service-included price like Amazon employed with the Kindle?
2) The device uses a lesser-known aggregator (Jasper Wireless) to carry the traffic and data.  Have you looked at the coverage maps for the service?  They&#039;re not wonderful ouside of the biggest cities.  This is a connected device - when you lose signal you not only traffic, but all of your &quot;connected&quot; services (like Yahoo Local search and Send 2 Car).  They should have used someone with more solid coverage areas to carry the data traffic.
3) For the premium price, this device has a so-so processor (only 400MHz) and a low-res screen (WQVGA only).  For a lot less I can get VGA (or better) screen resolution and a device based on a more powerful processor.  And don&#039;t get me started on the wonderful 2 hour battery life.
4) They have a LOT of work to do on their routing/rerouting algorithms.  I have read many many accounts of poor route selection from this device.
This device has been so overhyped as the &quot;ultimate&quot; GPS navigation unit, yet it is so flawed in so many ways.  It has potential, but it has been so poorly executed.
What were they thinking?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done more than a few GPS / Navigation reviews over the years (including for one of the bigger GPS-related sites) and people have been extremely excited about this product.  I&#8217;ve been a little less excited about this product.  Here&#8217;s why:</p><p>1) The device requires ongoing payments of at least $10/month to be useful.  I&#8221;m not sure I want to pay that much for just traffic info when I can get full satellite radio, which includes traffic info for just a couple of bucks more.  How about a service-included price like Amazon employed with the Kindle?</p><p>2) The device uses a lesser-known aggregator (Jasper Wireless) to carry the traffic and data.  Have you looked at the coverage maps for the service?  They&#8217;re not wonderful ouside of the biggest cities.  This is a connected device &#8211; when you lose signal you not only traffic, but all of your &#8220;connected&#8221; services (like Yahoo Local search and Send 2 Car).  They should have used someone with more solid coverage areas to carry the data traffic.</p><p>3) For the premium price, this device has a so-so processor (only 400MHz) and a low-res screen (WQVGA only).  For a lot less I can get VGA (or better) screen resolution and a device based on a more powerful processor.  And don&#8217;t get me started on the wonderful 2 hour battery life.</p><p>4) They have a LOT of work to do on their routing/rerouting algorithms.  I have read many many accounts of poor route selection from this device.</p><p>This device has been so overhyped as the &#8220;ultimate&#8221; GPS navigation unit, yet it is so flawed in so many ways.  It has potential, but it has been so poorly executed.</p><p>What were they thinking?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
