Posted on 02 July 2008, at 8:14 pm, by Christopher Spera
Why is everyone so quick to criticize? The masses haven’t even seen the bloody thing yet..!
This is the first in a 2 part series related to some criticism I’ve hard on the iPhone 3G. You’ll see the second part of this next week.
Ok… I admit it…I was one of the many iPhone-hypers on Monday 6/9/08…and I was really hoping that Steve would have had the stores stocked and ready to buy that day as well…but that’s just sour grapes now.
I’ve been watching a lot of commentary hit the air since all of the interesting announcements on Monday 6/9; and I’ve really tried to hold myself back, as I am certain that everyone and their brother is going to have something to say…but I just can’t leave it alone. Oh well…
I saw an article on Extreme Tech titled, “The Top 10 reasons why the iPhone 3G Sucks,” and it was really the straw the broke the camel’s back. The iPhone was one of the most widely anticipated devices of 2007. There were rumors of it for almost 4 years. While the iPhone hardware hasn’t changed too much beyond the implementation of a 3G radio (they got rid of the aluminum back and replaced it with plastic, etc.), the experience is going to change a whole lot; and I don’t know how anyone can truly, TRULY pan this thing without getting a hold of it, and playing for at least a couple of weeks or so.
While I’m not going to go thru all 10 points here and rebut them all, there are a few of things that I do want to touch on regarding the article:
…Pricing
Well it’s true that Apple has made a real effort to lower prices, why couldn’t they have gotten the price down to $99 instead of $199? I have to wonder about this, given how some people are having a tough time making ends meet these days. With gas costing $4 or more per gallon I’m forced to wonder if many people will have $199 to pay for a phone.If the price point had been a bit lower at $99, I think Apple would have really hit the sweet spot and sold more phones than they might have otherwise. It’s not that $199 is particularly bad; $99 is better because it will entice a lot more people to ante up for the iPhone 3G
There’s a great deal of debate going on about this particular point; and a lot of information has come to light since the original announcement 3 weeks ago. To an extent, I agree with the above statement. $200 bucks is a lot to pay for anything, especially when a tank of regular gas (depending on size of tank, and geographic location) can run anywhere between $50-$75 bucks easy. I spent $66 bucks filling my wife’s 15 gallon Mazda MPV this weekend alone. A lot of people may have $199 to dish out for the iPhone 8GB, but I don’t know how many actually will. At $99 bucks, they would have enticed a lot more people in this economy. However, the $200 price drop is a huge benefit for everyone, and brings this closer to what some are calling a discretionary purchase.
There’s also been a lot of press on the additional data charges associated with the new phone. The TOC of the device has been raised by $40 bucks over the course of the 2 year contract extension, due to a $10 per month raise in the data plan rate, compared to the previous version iPhone.
I was talking with Chris Gavula about this the other day, and found out some very interesting things that were initially news to me…
1. The $199/$299 prices are truly subsidized prices.
2. The retail only pricing has finally been announced.
3. Everyone will be able to buy an iPhone. At most, you’re going to pay $599 for an 8GB device or $699 for a 16GB device.Â
Again, you can’t get the device without a data plan, and unless deployed in the Enterprise, data plans are $30 bucks/ month. However, the big kicker to all of this is that the new device prices are subsidized by EVERY iPhone 3G owner.
AT&T’s 3G network isn’t that large yet; and while the device will seamlessly switch back and forth between 2G/3G as long as the 3G radio is turned on, not EVERYONE with an iPhone 3G will benefit from the increased network speed, though you WILL be paying for it. The extra $240 bucks you’re paying over the course of your new 2 year commitment, more than covers the price cut Apple and AT&T are giving everyone. Take a look at AT&T’s 3G coverage map, and you’ll see what I mean… the dark blue areas are 3G coverage. I live in Chicago, and not all of the metro area is covered by the 3G network, so thanks to every EDGE only covered customer out there. I appreciate you helping to lower the cost of my new iPhone 3G… [ducking!]
…Storage
At the show, Apple announced that the new 3G iPhone would come in 8GB and 16GB versions. I’m totally underwhelmed by this—I’d wanted at least 32GB and maybe even 64GB! Paying $299 for a measly 16GB really frosts my buns and I think Apple should be ashamed of themselves.Bear in mind that when we talk about storage we will no longer be dealing just with movies, podcasts, music, and audiobooks. The App Store is going to be filled with zillions of cool applications that are going to take up a lot of space over time. So that 16GB that seems like so much is going to get filled up fast—far faster than most people realize.
Come on, Apple. Stop screwing us on the storage and get real for once. 32GB should be the bare minimum for any iPhone at this point. The 3G iPhone’s storage options suck, there’s no other way to say it.
I agree and disagree here. 6GB and 16GB are way too small. However, I think that 32GB and 64GB isn’t nearly enough if the above is accurate. If the device will now use device based storage for application data as well as multimedia data, then the above is very true. We’re going to go through 8GB/16GB very quickly. The device still doesn’t offer an SD/MicroSD/MiniSD slot, so you’re stuck with what ever is on the device.
While you may be able to use MobileME for some storage, sticking everything in The Cloud isn’t always a great idea. If you can’t get internet access, getting to your data there is going to be impossible.
When iPod Classic devices have 80GB/160GB options, why iPhone and iPod Touch devices are still stuck with Nano/ circa 2003-2004 storage options is beyond me. I’d take a thicker device any day of the week if it meant I had an 80GB/160GB option for my iPhone. Wouldn’t you?
What’s going to really tick me off here, is that Apple no doubt sees this, agrees and is in the process of pulling larger capacity iPhones together now. Give it 3 months… I can almost guarantee that come the end of the year, you’re going to see a 64GB+ sized iPhone hit the shelves. I’m still gonna be stuck at 16GB, and carrying around my 5G iPod so that I can have the rest of my music and video with me when I want it.
Ahh, the beauty of carrying more than one device…
I’d love to hear what everyone has to say about all of the above. Please join us in the discussion area and let us know what you think.Â
Next week, I will finish up the series and talk a little about GPS, ActiveSync and 3G. Stay tuned!!
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:08 pm
I’m not saying the iPhone is perfect, and the $10 price bump on data dampened my enthusiasm enough for me to plan on waiting to see how things pan out, including what kind of apps come out and the hope that there will be a 32GB version by Christmas. But I really think some of these complaints are no better than the article you’re quoting.
I don’t know why everyone’s making such a big deal about the *iPhone* data prices being raised. Every smartphone from AT&T is supposed to cost the same for data, and everyone who has one is in the same boat as to whether they’ll have 3G coverage, whether they buy an iPhone or a BlackJack or whatever. Yes, it really sucks that AT&T backslid from the deal Apple extracted from them on the first go around, but pretty much all the major cell phone companies charge the same, so it shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Personally, I prefer flash storage over the spinning microdrives in iPod classics. It’s not about the size of the device. And an 8GB iPod nano costs $199 in 2008, which is the same about of storage as the base iPhone, so I’m not sure where the “circa 2003-2004″ comment comes from. Granted, that’s not subsidized, but it also doesn’t do nearly as much as an iPhone, so I think the price is pretty much well in line with Apple products (except for that ridiculous $499/$599 non-contract price). I suppose it would be nice to have an option for an iPod Classic drive for those interested, but Apple doesn’t tend to offer that many versions of the same product. And by naming it “classic”, I think it’s obvious Apple is edging it towards the door and going all flash.
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 pm
Your missing alot.
You won’t need all your music stored on the device’s memory if you have reasonably fast 3g access to the “cloud”.
I currently have a Palm 700p with a whopping 64mb of onboard ram and a 2 gig SD card.
I have a Separate video Player with 32gigs that really has more than 4 to 8 gigs on it as I watch stuff and then delete it. Why would I watch a movie over and over?
Biggest reason for they 3g’s success…
Combine decent wireless throughput, with a great OS/UI and then plug in the GPS and its “nice…”
Now you add the App store which is 10x more important than anything else in the announcement, and you will see so many ground breaking applications your head will spin next year.
Hmm, a few off the top of the head that I could think of creating:
1) A true Golf GPS, with full graphics of the course and real time distances…Scratch spending $500 on a clunky golf GPS
2) A phone with a screen to be big enough to be a reasonable substitute for a dedicated GPS. WIth the wireless access, full real time traffic will be available.
3) Now take number 2 and add cool features a small developer can add that a big company might shy away from like say a button to hit when you see a speed trap and all other iphone carrying people get an alert when the approach the area????Hmm….
4) Full geo located points of interest and directory assistance that is real time updated rather than 2 years old like my built in GPS in the car.
5) Full ability to program my Tivo and remotely and watch anything on the iphone as if I was home. THis is already in beta.
6) A device that makes it viable to do remote order entry or service ticket closure along with customer signature and real time sync back to HQ. An enterprise software developers dream come true…
July 3rd, 2008 at 9:37 am
@mchinsky: yes and no… Please remember that this is a 2 part article, and the other part will come out next week.
some of the things you say are missing, may appear “later” in the full article (i.e. both parts).
I love your app suggestions, though. I’d love to see some of this GPS stuff take off (without getting too overbearing and intrusive)
@tamaracks: I get the difference in flash vs. microdrive storeage, but don’t care… I’d take the microdrive in my iPhone if it gave me more space. Right now, there with 8GB/16GB of storage, there just ain’t enough space. I like watching video multiple times (I can watch movies I like over and over and not get bored with them), and regularily have a couple-three full length movies on my iPod at all times. I’m not certain how this is going to work, carrying 2 iPods… I’m not going to want (or be able to, due to insufficient space on my iPhone) to have the same content on both devices. Its going to be interesting to see how all of that (content management) works out.
July 3rd, 2008 at 10:22 am
@christopher: I can understand that some people would want microdrives (even though I think you’re all completely balmy
). Maybe it just seems odd to me to complain that the flash storage isn’t big enough, when it’s about as big as other Apple flash devices. I can see your point, I just don’t think the storage is likely to get too much bigger without going to microdrives, and I’m pretty sure Apple has no intention of doing that. I expect they are waiting for flash prices to match the price points they are trying to maintain. I would hope to see a 32GB version this year, since they already have the iPod Touch in that size. I’m not so sure about 64GB so soon.