<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Nokia 6220 Classic Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Arash</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-42538</link> <dc:creator>Arash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-42538</guid> <description>and it price near 250 US$ and not 655$ ! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it price near 250 US$ and not 655$ !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arash</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-42537</link> <dc:creator>Arash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:54:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-42537</guid> <description>i think its perfect phone. with 5mp camera , 16 million color , XENON Flash light and more but it battery as 900 mAh maybe 1200 more better for this phone cuz 3:30 talk time not good! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its perfect phone. with 5mp camera , 16 million color , XENON Flash light and more but it battery as 900 mAh maybe 1200 more better for this phone cuz 3:30 talk time not good!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nokia Daily News 07/24/08 &#124; Nokia Daily News</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38517</link> <dc:creator>Nokia Daily News 07/24/08 &#124; Nokia Daily News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:09:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38517</guid> <description>[...] Diary - 6220c review, like a cut-rate N95, via WOM [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Diary &#8211; 6220c review, like a cut-rate N95, via WOM [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38509</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:01:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38509</guid> <description>This device seems to have a premium price (a little over $650 USD) but not enough premium features to justify it.  I don&#039;t think the high quality camera is enough to justify that price -  especially if you can get the E71 for a similar price.
The E71 is nice enough, but the QVGA screeen, even with the increased color depth, is pretty much a dealbreaker for me. Unfortunately, it looks like the prelim specs on the N96 indicate it will also have only a QVGA screen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This device seems to have a premium price (a little over $650 USD) but not enough premium features to justify it.  I don&#8217;t think the high quality camera is enough to justify that price &#8211;  especially if you can get the E71 for a similar price.</p><p>The E71 is nice enough, but the QVGA screeen, even with the increased color depth, is pretty much a dealbreaker for me. Unfortunately, it looks like the prelim specs on the N96 indicate it will also have only a QVGA screen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WOM World / Nokia &#187; Blog Archive - 6220 – a ‘cut price N95’?</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38505</link> <dc:creator>WOM World / Nokia &#187; Blog Archive - 6220 – a ‘cut price N95’?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:24:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38505</guid> <description>[...] Oke from Gear Diary has had his hands on the 6220 Classic and has been ‘very [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oke from Gear Diary has had his hands on the 6220 Classic and has been ‘very [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mitchell Oke</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38501</link> <dc:creator>Mitchell Oke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38501</guid> <description>Drew, I&#039;m with you, their lines are so blurred it&#039;s crazy. At least they aren&#039;t redying the same phone over and over and sticking &quot;Limitied Edition&quot; tags on it like Motorola.
I&#039;m looking forward to testing an N96, simply because I liked the N95 (well, the N95 8GB actually).
Yep, the E71 is just brilliant. I picked mine up for $550, so it&#039;s cheap too, but you certainly wouldn&#039;t know that looking at it, holding it or using it. That review will have a halo on top.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew, I&#8217;m with you, their lines are so blurred it&#8217;s crazy. At least they aren&#8217;t redying the same phone over and over and sticking &#8220;Limitied Edition&#8221; tags on it like Motorola.</p><p>I&#8217;m looking forward to testing an N96, simply because I liked the N95 (well, the N95 8GB actually).</p><p>Yep, the E71 is just brilliant. I picked mine up for $550, so it&#8217;s cheap too, but you certainly wouldn&#8217;t know that looking at it, holding it or using it. That review will have a halo on top.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nokia 6220 Classic Review &#124; ComVan - News</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38496</link> <dc:creator>Nokia 6220 Classic Review &#124; ComVan - News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38496</guid> <description>[...] via:geardiary [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via:geardiary [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrvlngDrew</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/23/nokia-6220-classic-review/#comment-38495</link> <dc:creator>TrvlngDrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:29:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10112#comment-38495</guid> <description>Mitchell, Nokia is really confusing me.. N78, N82, 6220c, they are so close as to niggling over the details..  For the price point and features, go with the N82 for a bit more right?
OR let&#039;s all hold up and wait for the N96.
BTW, I&#039;ve been playing with an E71 as my BlackBerry for the past couple weeks, talk about rock solid!  Keyboard a little small for my fat fingers, otherwise..  :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitchell, Nokia is really confusing me.. N78, N82, 6220c, they are so close as to niggling over the details..  For the price point and features, go with the N82 for a bit more right?</p><p>OR let&#8217;s all hold up and wait for the N96.</p><p>BTW, I&#8217;ve been playing with an E71 as my BlackBerry for the past couple weeks, talk about rock solid!  Keyboard a little small for my fat fingers, otherwise.. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
