<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: CellRanger &#8211; the answer to IPhone 3G signal woes?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/24/cellranger-the-answer-to-iphone-3g-signal-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/24/cellranger-the-answer-to-iphone-3g-signal-woes/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BenE</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/24/cellranger-the-answer-to-iphone-3g-signal-woes/#comment-39575</link> <dc:creator>BenE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:20:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10844#comment-39575</guid> <description>I have a friend who&#039;s also getting excellent Cell Ranger Stix results with AT&amp;T (GSM) service, but I&#039;m not seeing any improvement with Verizon CDMA service:
http://www.panbo.com/archives/2008/09/cellranger_stix_bummer_but.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend who&#8217;s also getting excellent Cell Ranger Stix results with AT&amp;T (GSM) service, but I&#8217;m not seeing any improvement with Verizon CDMA service:</p><p><a
href="http://www.panbo.com/archives/2008/09/cellranger_stix_bummer_but.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.panbo.com/archives/2008/09/cellranger_stix_bummer_but.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: giuseppe1010</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/24/cellranger-the-answer-to-iphone-3g-signal-woes/#comment-38962</link> <dc:creator>giuseppe1010</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:48:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10844#comment-38962</guid> <description>I tested the Cell Ranger signal booster I bought from:
http://www.cellranger.net
with my iPhone on AT&amp;T in the US
Below are my results in my office in Wayne, NJ:
I used http://i.dslr.net/tinyspeedtest.html for data rate tests
2G
Without Cell Ranger
Signal: -91 to -79 dBm
Voice Quality: Voices break up
EDGE Data Rate: Unstable connections, some speed tests could not complete
With Cell Ranger
Signal -61 to -57 dBm
Voice Quality: Voices no longer break up
EDGE Data Rate: Stable connections, 87 kbps average
3G Data
Without Cell Ranger
Signal: -93 to -103
Data Rate: Switches to EDGE sometimes, 672 kbps average when using 3G
With Cell Ranger
Signal: -87 to -103
Data Rate: Switches to EDGE sometimes, 751 kbps average when using 3G
My data rate results on 3G weren&#039;t as good with the booster as the ones reported in this article but my voice results were excellent and it definitely fixed the problems I was having with voices breaking up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested the Cell Ranger signal booster I bought from:</p><p><a
href="http://www.cellranger.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.cellranger.net</a></p><p>with my iPhone on AT&amp;T in the US</p><p>Below are my results in my office in Wayne, NJ:</p><p>I used <a
href="http://i.dslr.net/tinyspeedtest.html" rel="nofollow">http://i.dslr.net/tinyspeedtest.html</a> for data rate tests</p><p>2G</p><p>Without Cell Ranger<br
/> Signal: -91 to -79 dBm<br
/> Voice Quality: Voices break up<br
/> EDGE Data Rate: Unstable connections, some speed tests could not complete</p><p>With Cell Ranger<br
/> Signal -61 to -57 dBm<br
/> Voice Quality: Voices no longer break up<br
/> EDGE Data Rate: Stable connections, 87 kbps average</p><p>3G Data</p><p>Without Cell Ranger<br
/> Signal: -93 to -103<br
/> Data Rate: Switches to EDGE sometimes, 672 kbps average when using 3G</p><p>With Cell Ranger<br
/> Signal: -87 to -103<br
/> Data Rate: Switches to EDGE sometimes, 751 kbps average when using 3G</p><p>My data rate results on 3G weren&#8217;t as good with the booster as the ones reported in this article but my voice results were excellent and it definitely fixed the problems I was having with voices breaking up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/24/cellranger-the-answer-to-iphone-3g-signal-woes/#comment-38507</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:40:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=10844#comment-38507</guid> <description>Their website seems to indicate they are planning to launch a home version that will cover about 2500sq ft in the first part of 2009.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their website seems to indicate they are planning to launch a home version that will cover about 2500sq ft in the first part of 2009.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
