<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Review: Sakar Crayola Digital Camera</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: binsky</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40258</link> <dc:creator>binsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40258</guid> <description>Thanks much.  Don&#039;t really need to know how the Mac version works, just that there is a Mac software version.
I think the difference between the 2 models discussed is the resolution.  Many sites just don&#039;t give the model # but I think if it&#039;s the 2.1 megapixel it&#039;s the 25070.  Also, to anyone looking, if you google 2.1 model 25050 you will often get a picture and description of this camera but it will say &quot;digital camcorder&quot;.  Weird, huh?
Thanks again, Doug!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks much.  Don&#8217;t really need to know how the Mac version works, just that there is a Mac software version.<br
/> I think the difference between the 2 models discussed is the resolution.  Many sites just don&#8217;t give the model # but I think if it&#8217;s the 2.1 megapixel it&#8217;s the 25070.  Also, to anyone looking, if you google 2.1 model 25050 you will often get a picture and description of this camera but it will say &#8220;digital camcorder&#8221;.  Weird, huh?</p><p>Thanks again, Doug!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Goldring</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40257</link> <dc:creator>Doug Goldring</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40257</guid> <description>Hey, Binsky.  The software worked fine on XP and Vista.  I think there was a Mac version, but I do not havea Mac and did cannot tell you how that works.
The one I reviewed had a flash, but I am not sure that all of the models have flashes.
Doug</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Binsky.  The software worked fine on XP and Vista.  I think there was a Mac version, but I do not havea Mac and did cannot tell you how that works.</p><p>The one I reviewed had a flash, but I am not sure that all of the models have flashes.</p><p>Doug</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: binsky</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40256</link> <dc:creator>binsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-40256</guid> <description>Thinking this is just what I was looking for for my 6 year old niece for Christmas but can&#039;t find any info on software compatibility - PC &amp; mac?  Does it have a flash?
Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking this is just what I was looking for for my 6 year old niece for Christmas but can&#8217;t find any info on software compatibility &#8211; PC &amp; mac?  Does it have a flash?</p><p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: prholmes</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39029</link> <dc:creator>prholmes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39029</guid> <description>Thanks.... I appreciate it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230;. I appreciate it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Goldring</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39028</link> <dc:creator>Doug Goldring</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:03:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39028</guid> <description>prholmes.  I don;t know what happened.  When I wrote the review, it was on Amazon.  But I do not see it now.  I will see if I can find out.
Doug</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prholmes.  I don;t know what happened.  When I wrote the review, it was on Amazon.  But I do not see it now.  I will see if I can find out.</p><p>Doug</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: prholmes</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39027</link> <dc:creator>prholmes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:10:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-39027</guid> <description>Where did you find the 25070 model that is a 2.1 megapixel?  All I am finding is model 23072 or 23075 which is a kit.  I need this for a birthday next week.  Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you find the 25070 model that is a 2.1 megapixel?  All I am finding is model 23072 or 23075 which is a kit.  I need this for a birthday next week.  Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Goldring</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-38551</link> <dc:creator>Doug Goldring</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-38551</guid> <description>uzziah0
I think you are right.  I noticed only last night that there is the 23070 and the 25070.  I reviewed the 25070,which is a 2 megapixel camera.  The 23070, I think, is only 1 megapixel.
Still, the pictures were generally not great.  But I looked at it more as a toy and a learning experience more than a picture taking tool. :)
Doug</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uzziah0</p><p>I think you are right.  I noticed only last night that there is the 23070 and the 25070.  I reviewed the 25070,which is a 2 megapixel camera.  The 23070, I think, is only 1 megapixel.</p><p>Still, the pictures were generally not great.  But I looked at it more as a toy and a learning experience more than a picture taking tool. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Doug</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: uzziah0</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-38547</link> <dc:creator>uzziah0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:00:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/07/25/review-sakar-crayola-digital-camera/#comment-38547</guid> <description>Wow, you must have gotten a DELUXE version of this camera.
My son got one for his birthday in January.
It looks just like the one in your pictures, but his does not have an SD slot.
The pictures he gets are WORTHLESS. I was there when he took the pictures, and I can barely tell what some of the pictures are.
The Crayola software looks the same too, but I was totally stricken by how bad the pictures were, that I didn&#039;t pay attention to the how good the software was or wasn&#039;t.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you must have gotten a DELUXE version of this camera.<br
/> My son got one for his birthday in January.<br
/> It looks just like the one in your pictures, but his does not have an SD slot.<br
/> The pictures he gets are WORTHLESS. I was there when he took the pictures, and I can barely tell what some of the pictures are.</p><p>The Crayola software looks the same too, but I was totally stricken by how bad the pictures were, that I didn&#8217;t pay attention to the how good the software was or wasn&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
