10 Comments For This Post

1. petesonline Says:
   August 6th, 2008 at 10:07 pm

   Mitchell you saved the day. This morning I read your review of this phone, at the same time I got an email from bu*.com that the phone was on sale for 399, since I was in the market to retire my Treo 750 I decided to take the leap of faith (I was going to buy the Jesus phone, but it seems like there are too many issues ,i.e reception problems, with that phone at this time). With mastercard in hand I made my purchase. I also saw TBG’s video review of this phone which was very positive. After, work I started visiting the Nokia forums and googling other sites to get a better feel for my purchase. WOW, my joy of owning this new phone fell like a house of cards, when in the search field I entered e71 and problems. Yup the first item was TBG’s post about the e71 and reception problems. I avoided the Jesus phone for this very reason. After feeling in the dumps and hours of googleing to see how extensive this issue is and debating on whether to keep the phone or sending it back, I came across your latest post. I’m sticking with you and the e71 (at least until the return period is about to run out). Wish me luck.

2. markntravis Says:
   August 6th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

   Since your firmware is dated today yours may very well be different than TBG’s.

3. Mitchell Oke Says:
   August 7th, 2008 at 7:02 am

   Haha, I actually meant June 8th. Here in Australia we write dates dd-mm-yyyy, not mm-dd-yyyy, can cause some confusion on these here internets.

4. markntravis Says:
   August 7th, 2008 at 10:01 am

   Since people that write for blogs may be from places all over the world writing out the name of the month is a must I think.

5. markntravis Says:
   August 7th, 2008 at 10:03 am

   I should add that your ROM may still be different than his. I didn’t read his report so don’t know if he noted his ROM version.

6. Mitchell Oke Says:
   August 7th, 2008 at 9:02 pm

   It likely is, and that can make the world of difference when it comes to signal. HTC devices can be very different depending on the ROM version you use.

7. petesonline Says:
   August 8th, 2008 at 4:20 pm

   Very disappointed, the phone is very slim and sexy, but the 3g reception is horrible. I tested the Nokia E71-2 against a Treo 750. Using dslreports.com/mspeed and a 400kb test file tested each phone 3 times, the average score was: Nokia scored a 27kb on ATT’s 3g network (the indicator did show 3g) while the Treo 750 scored 257kb on ATT’s 3g network (the indicator did show 3g).
   This is my phone info:
   100.07.76
   8-6-2008
   RM357
   Nokia E71-2(30)

   The phone is super sexy and it just feels awesome in my hands, the icons are dated and bland but you can download better ones with ease. At $399 I’ll have to pass and send it back for a refund.

8. petesonline Says:
   August 8th, 2008 at 4:48 pm

   WHATTTTTTT! I have to do a second take. Okay just becasue I hate to give up and the fact that I can’t belive how a company like Nokia would mess on quality control by not testing the phone thoroughly, I checked into adjusting the phones settings. Tools, settings, phone, network, network mode, (what is this option: dual mode, UMTS, GSM) my phone was on dual mode so I switched it to UMTS and ran the speed test again x3 average 512kbs. This option might drain the battery quickly and not allow me to make calls outside of the 3g netwok, but the phone is speedy. More testing to come. The voice quality is very nice and phone calls are clear and crisp. Looks like I might change my mind after all.

9. Mitchell Oke Says:
   August 8th, 2008 at 5:08 pm

   Petesonline, I updated my post with the speed test I did on my E71-1, and as you can see it’s bloody quick for me!

   The information screen shows these details for my phone:

   100.07.76
   08-06-2008 (meaning June 8th)
   RM-346
   Nokia E71-1 (27)

   I must say that’s a very poor result for the Treo as well, I got double the speeds at least when I had it!

10. petesonline Says:
    August 9th, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Michell, I agree with you, my Treo 750 on our ATT network is a dog, the highest I ever got it was 850kb’s.

    I think I found the problem with my E71, the ATT network is overcrowded as a result of the iphone. I set my E71 to dual mode early this morning and I got the fastest results I ever got with any phone to date 1215. I didn’t even think it was possible. Thanks for your post it helped me make my mind up E71 is my main phone now.

    PS, I have nothing but huge respect for BG I have been reading his posts for a long time now. But what he uncovered wasn’t a huge discovery. If anyone looks in the E-71 manual you’ll see that Nokia has a warning and disclaimer that covering the back top or bottom portion of the phone may cause reception problem or battery drain due to the phone working extra to connect to the network.

    The E71 is super nice and the size is unbelivable, when you consider what is in it. I put it up there when Moto Razer first came out and it seemed to deify reality. I wish we as americans including me weren’t trained through years of marketing that big equals good. This phone is super slim and is superior in quality and options to most phones twice the size of this.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

1. The Cell Phone Junkie Show #115 « Mickey Papillon Says:
   August 11th, 2008 at 12:11 am

   [...] Thunder 9530 on Verizon October 13th Nokia E71 on buy.com Nokia E71 suffering from RF issues E71 no issues with RF iPhone production up to 800,000 per week Motorola Alexander Sidekick Slide outed from [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.