<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The iPhone 3G as a Business Tool &#8211; Part 2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Red blobs on the calendar? - AVForums.com</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-40352</link> <dc:creator>Red blobs on the calendar? - AVForums.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-40352</guid> <description>[...] Red blobs on the calendar?     Read about it here :  The iPhone 3G as a Business Tool - Part 2*&#124;*Gear Diary  Its something to do with invitations.   __________________ A Ton Sash [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Red blobs on the calendar?     Read about it here :  The iPhone 3G as a Business Tool &#8211; Part 2*|*Gear Diary  Its something to do with invitations.   __________________ A Ton Sash [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kbokor</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-40215</link> <dc:creator>kbokor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:52:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-40215</guid> <description>Hi all, absolutely agree with the shortcomings of the iphone from a &quot;business&quot; perspective.  As an ex-BB power user, I tend to take these functions as something that should be standard.
However, I agree with the postitioning of the iphone as a consumer first then business second and am confident that Apple will get around to the &quot;enhancements&quot; that email/calendar users need.
I just switched from a samsung jack to iphone 3g with MS exchange/activesync and love the phone and multimedia functions.  Leaps and bounds over samsung and BB.  I&#039;m even getting used to the keyboard (but did buy an istore app that allows for keyboard use in landscape mode).
Overall, am very happy with the iphone and I do use it everyday for business and personal use.  All of my calendar is on it as well as my work exchange.  Yes, the calendar invite is not the greatest on the iphone, but I can wait till I get to my pc/laptop to schedule a meeting.
Great reviews/feedback from you and all and I look forward to reading many more!  I am glad I found this site in google search and will keep coming back.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, absolutely agree with the shortcomings of the iphone from a &#8220;business&#8221; perspective.  As an ex-BB power user, I tend to take these functions as something that should be standard.</p><p>However, I agree with the postitioning of the iphone as a consumer first then business second and am confident that Apple will get around to the &#8220;enhancements&#8221; that email/calendar users need.</p><p>I just switched from a samsung jack to iphone 3g with MS exchange/activesync and love the phone and multimedia functions.  Leaps and bounds over samsung and BB.  I&#8217;m even getting used to the keyboard (but did buy an istore app that allows for keyboard use in landscape mode).</p><p>Overall, am very happy with the iphone and I do use it everyday for business and personal use.  All of my calendar is on it as well as my work exchange.  Yes, the calendar invite is not the greatest on the iphone, but I can wait till I get to my pc/laptop to schedule a meeting.</p><p>Great reviews/feedback from you and all and I look forward to reading many more!  I am glad I found this site in google search and will keep coming back.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Spera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39836</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Spera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:00:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39836</guid> <description>@Chris Gavula I will cover those briefly in the last part of this series; but its going to be much the same.  I am not even going to install/try on MobileME&#039;s sync solution, as its a freakin&#039; mess.  I don&#039;t know of anyone that is using it in a business setting right now. Its just too problematic.  Also, I don&#039;t know of anyone else that is using any other server/sync system.  I don&#039;t know of any that offers a complete enterprise level PIM sync, OTA, other Exhange (being a WM devotee, I haven&#039;t had experience with any)...and again, MobileME can&#039;t support this activity with any accuracy and dependability right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Gavula I will cover those briefly in the last part of this series; but its going to be much the same.  I am not even going to install/try on MobileME&#8217;s sync solution, as its a freakin&#8217; mess.  I don&#8217;t know of anyone that is using it in a business setting right now. Its just too problematic.  Also, I don&#8217;t know of anyone else that is using any other server/sync system.  I don&#8217;t know of any that offers a complete enterprise level PIM sync, OTA, other Exhange (being a WM devotee, I haven&#8217;t had experience with any)&#8230;and again, MobileME can&#8217;t support this activity with any accuracy and dependability right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39835</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39835</guid> <description>Gavula, I agree, and the missing search function would be part of such a discussion, as would the absence of both a todo and memo part in the pim. If the iphone is going to be taken seriously as a business device, it simply cannot leave such features out, whatever success it may have at syncing with Exchange.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavula, I agree, and the missing search function would be part of such a discussion, as would the absence of both a todo and memo part in the pim. If the iphone is going to be taken seriously as a business device, it simply cannot leave such features out, whatever success it may have at syncing with Exchange.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39820</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:30:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39820</guid> <description>But Chris you really didn&#039;t address non-Exchange solutions and the success or failure of those.  I really think it would be useful for you to explore those as well.  You&#039;re commenting on business readiness, but only in one dimension - the MS ecosystem.  To do this topic justice, I&#039;d like to see you expand the scope of your evaluation to non MS ecosystems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Chris you really didn&#8217;t address non-Exchange solutions and the success or failure of those.  I really think it would be useful for you to explore those as well.  You&#8217;re commenting on business readiness, but only in one dimension &#8211; the MS ecosystem.  To do this topic justice, I&#8217;d like to see you expand the scope of your evaluation to non MS ecosystems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Spera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39805</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Spera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39805</guid> <description>@BK858, you&#039;re right.  This article didn&#039;t compare the iPhone to any other phone. It wasn&#039;t supposed to.  What its supposed to do is draw attention to what the iPhone can/cannot currently do, while Apple tries to market it as a tool for implementation in the Enterprise. Over the last few weeks, we&#039;ve pointed out some deficiencies that need to be addressed.  Next week, Part 3 will look at Mail and Tasks, draw conclusions and offer a couple recommendations for Apple to resolve what everyone (myself included) has been commenting on here.
Again, it wasn&#039;t meant as a reivew of one device over another.  I know the BB has been around for a LONG time and has this space nailed.  That&#039;s not the point of the article.  Again, I wanted to clearly point out and identify all of the growth points so Apple knows what its users want and need, IF they are to catch up at all.
I think they can catch up, and can catch up fairly quickly; but they are going to have to tackle some specific tasks.  I&#039;ll detail some of those out next week...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BK858, you&#8217;re right.  This article didn&#8217;t compare the iPhone to any other phone. It wasn&#8217;t supposed to.  What its supposed to do is draw attention to what the iPhone can/cannot currently do, while Apple tries to market it as a tool for implementation in the Enterprise. Over the last few weeks, we&#8217;ve pointed out some deficiencies that need to be addressed.  Next week, Part 3 will look at Mail and Tasks, draw conclusions and offer a couple recommendations for Apple to resolve what everyone (myself included) has been commenting on here.</p><p>Again, it wasn&#8217;t meant as a reivew of one device over another.  I know the BB has been around for a LONG time and has this space nailed.  That&#8217;s not the point of the article.  Again, I wanted to clearly point out and identify all of the growth points so Apple knows what its users want and need, IF they are to catch up at all.</p><p>I think they can catch up, and can catch up fairly quickly; but they are going to have to tackle some specific tasks.  I&#8217;ll detail some of those out next week&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BK858</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39802</link> <dc:creator>BK858</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39802</guid> <description>This critique is interesting but I think it leaves out some important comparisons against other phones that can sync from Microsoft Exchange servers.  Do those other phones provide the capabilities that you desire on the iPhone?  I&#039;ve owned phones with Windows mobile on them but my company doesn&#039;t allow syncing with Exchange so I really don&#039;t know what those phones do or don&#039;t support.
Bottom line, Blackberry still owns the business market and for good reason, in my opinion.  That&#039;s a difficult market to break into and I think Apple is going the right direction by marketing to regular consumers and the like while building enterprise and business-friendly functionality over time.  Blackberry has been in this market for many years now and it&#039;s really not reasonable for Apple to catch up overnight.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This critique is interesting but I think it leaves out some important comparisons against other phones that can sync from Microsoft Exchange servers.  Do those other phones provide the capabilities that you desire on the iPhone?  I&#8217;ve owned phones with Windows mobile on them but my company doesn&#8217;t allow syncing with Exchange so I really don&#8217;t know what those phones do or don&#8217;t support.</p><p>Bottom line, Blackberry still owns the business market and for good reason, in my opinion.  That&#8217;s a difficult market to break into and I think Apple is going the right direction by marketing to regular consumers and the like while building enterprise and business-friendly functionality over time.  Blackberry has been in this market for many years now and it&#8217;s really not reasonable for Apple to catch up overnight.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Spera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39801</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Spera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:19:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39801</guid> <description>Yes. I like vintage Journey.  I haven&#039;t had the chance to listen to any of the new stuff, though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I like vintage Journey.  I haven&#8217;t had the chance to listen to any of the new stuff, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sundarlal</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39799</link> <dc:creator>sundarlal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39799</guid> <description>You are Journey fan?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are Journey fan?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39795</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:56:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39795</guid> <description>Agreed, but when I realize that I can no longer categorize my appointments or find a person with a certain area code I begin to question my choice to go to the iPhone (from a MotoQ, when my Verizon contract ended). Nothing is perfect, and the iPhone is certainly more fun to use than the MotoQ. But I am not as impressed as you are by this business-ing of the iphone: my computer person had earlier - with some not especially complicated moves - sync&#039;ed his first-generation iPhone with an Exchange server, what is so great about Apple being able to do it?  I think we here all agree that as a business device, the iPhone is still not there (and it may never be, as the iphone remains, I think, mainly a consumer device): nothing makes that clearer to me than the number of people I have met who got the 3G phone, but continue to use their Blackberry.  BTW, I know of no smartphone - the iphone is a smartphone, right? - that lacks the search features I noted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, but when I realize that I can no longer categorize my appointments or find a person with a certain area code I begin to question my choice to go to the iPhone (from a MotoQ, when my Verizon contract ended). Nothing is perfect, and the iPhone is certainly more fun to use than the MotoQ. But I am not as impressed as you are by this business-ing of the iphone: my computer person had earlier &#8211; with some not especially complicated moves &#8211; sync&#8217;ed his first-generation iPhone with an Exchange server, what is so great about Apple being able to do it?  I think we here all agree that as a business device, the iPhone is still not there (and it may never be, as the iphone remains, I think, mainly a consumer device): nothing makes that clearer to me than the number of people I have met who got the 3G phone, but continue to use their Blackberry.  BTW, I know of no smartphone &#8211; the iphone is a smartphone, right? &#8211; that lacks the search features I noted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Spera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39794</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Spera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:28:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39794</guid> <description>&quot;For many people they did that. For Exchange power users, however, they did not. Again, as time moves forward, I believe they will improve the product and features and if not, third parties will step in. &quot;
You&#039;re right, Chris; provided Apple let&#039;s them step in.  It is very possible that Apple won&#039;t let them step in because those functions &quot;duplicate&quot; existing functions on the iPhone. I can&#039;t say that with certainty; but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised. They did that recently with a podcasting app.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For many people they did that. For Exchange power users, however, they did not. Again, as time moves forward, I believe they will improve the product and features and if not, third parties will step in. &#8221;</p><p>You&#8217;re right, Chris; provided Apple let&#8217;s them step in.  It is very possible that Apple won&#8217;t let them step in because those functions &#8220;duplicate&#8221; existing functions on the iPhone. I can&#8217;t say that with certainty; but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised. They did that recently with a podcasting app.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39792</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:21:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39792</guid> <description>I agree that the search features are definitely lacking, especially in what&#039;s supposed to be a PDA type phone, but MANY phones only offer name-based search, it&#039;s not that unusual.  I definitely wouldn&#039;t categorize it as &lt;i&gt;unforgiveable&lt;/i&gt;.
I think that Apple has 2 main, business-related problems.  One is that Apple has to better integrate the Exchange ecosystem experience (for those users that require Exchange services) into their own iCal/Mail/Contact model.  They did a pretty good job getting the basics in place, especially considering the short period of time they&#039;ve been working on it.  Just like Apple has a leg up on the music/video player market, MS has a leg up on corporate email because they already own one of the most popular infrastructures.  That makes it easier out of the gate for them.  Also MS has had 8 years + to make the experience better.  Many folk seem to forget how badly it sucked even a couple of years ago (remember the pre OTA days when ActiveStrink was the ONLY choice?).  Apple has had something like 7 months to get this done - that&#039;s it.  Do they need to do more?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Absolutely.
The second big problem they have is that they started with a personal focus, not a business focus.  Despite the hoopla surrounding the notion of the 2.x firmware being more &quot;business&quot; oriented that does not necessarily mean it&#039;s the best business tool or the best corporate tool.  It doesn&#039;t have to be - it was very successful as it was - all they had to do was make it business friendly &lt;i&gt;enough&lt;/i&gt;.  For many people they did that.  For Exchange power users, however, they did not.  Again, as time moves forward,  I believe they will improve the product and features and if not, third parties will step in.
The iPhone has already changed dramatically since its initial release a little over a year ago.  Unfortunately, I can&#039;t say that the WM system has improved nearly as quicky, but I&#039;m hoping the current pressure will lead to good changes on that platform as well.  One thing&#039;s for certain though - we haven&#039;t seen the end of the changes to either platform yet!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the search features are definitely lacking, especially in what&#8217;s supposed to be a PDA type phone, but MANY phones only offer name-based search, it&#8217;s not that unusual.  I definitely wouldn&#8217;t categorize it as <i>unforgiveable</i>.</p><p>I think that Apple has 2 main, business-related problems.  One is that Apple has to better integrate the Exchange ecosystem experience (for those users that require Exchange services) into their own iCal/Mail/Contact model.  They did a pretty good job getting the basics in place, especially considering the short period of time they&#8217;ve been working on it.  Just like Apple has a leg up on the music/video player market, MS has a leg up on corporate email because they already own one of the most popular infrastructures.  That makes it easier out of the gate for them.  Also MS has had 8 years + to make the experience better.  Many folk seem to forget how badly it sucked even a couple of years ago (remember the pre OTA days when ActiveStrink was the ONLY choice?).  Apple has had something like 7 months to get this done &#8211; that&#8217;s it.  Do they need to do more?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Absolutely.</p><p>The second big problem they have is that they started with a personal focus, not a business focus.  Despite the hoopla surrounding the notion of the 2.x firmware being more &#8220;business&#8221; oriented that does not necessarily mean it&#8217;s the best business tool or the best corporate tool.  It doesn&#8217;t have to be &#8211; it was very successful as it was &#8211; all they had to do was make it business friendly <i>enough</i>.  For many people they did that.  For Exchange power users, however, they did not.  Again, as time moves forward,  I believe they will improve the product and features and if not, third parties will step in.</p><p>The iPhone has already changed dramatically since its initial release a little over a year ago.  Unfortunately, I can&#8217;t say that the WM system has improved nearly as quicky, but I&#8217;m hoping the current pressure will lead to good changes on that platform as well.  One thing&#8217;s for certain though &#8211; we haven&#8217;t seen the end of the changes to either platform yet!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39791</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39791</guid> <description>I should have expressed myself with more precision. The search function in Contacts is simply primitive: you can search by name only, you cannot search numbers, locations, notes or anything else. You can search by name in a print phone book, it&#039;s the other search possibilities that distinguish the electronic method, and I think it absolutely unforgivable (yes, unforgivable!) for Apple to have left out something so basic and present in every other PDA or phone I have ever owned.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have expressed myself with more precision. The search function in Contacts is simply primitive: you can search by name only, you cannot search numbers, locations, notes or anything else. You can search by name in a print phone book, it&#8217;s the other search possibilities that distinguish the electronic method, and I think it absolutely unforgivable (yes, unforgivable!) for Apple to have left out something so basic and present in every other PDA or phone I have ever owned.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Spera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39790</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Spera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39790</guid> <description>@pradley,
While PI is a great tool, if it doesn&#039;t make use of the standard iCal databases, then that&#039;s a problem, IMHO.  My experience has been that apps that do this often create sync issues at SOME point, requiring some kind of uninstall/reinstall and data cleansing activity.  I&#039;m not saying that PI will cause these problems at all; but it would be better if it used the iCal databases. It uses the standard PIM databases on the WinMo side.  Alex must have run into a technical problem with using them to have done this this way...
As far as editing the appointment on the iPhone, my guess is that if you don&#039;t own the invitation, you can&#039;t edit it on the device. That&#039;s what I&#039;m seeing on my iPhone right now.
As far as search is concerned, Chris Gavula is right. Contacts does have a search function. Calendar does not. Were you talking about the Global Address List (GAL); or were you talking about a search function for Calendar?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pradley,</p><p>While PI is a great tool, if it doesn&#8217;t make use of the standard iCal databases, then that&#8217;s a problem, IMHO.  My experience has been that apps that do this often create sync issues at SOME point, requiring some kind of uninstall/reinstall and data cleansing activity.  I&#8217;m not saying that PI will cause these problems at all; but it would be better if it used the iCal databases. It uses the standard PIM databases on the WinMo side.  Alex must have run into a technical problem with using them to have done this this way&#8230;</p><p>As far as editing the appointment on the iPhone, my guess is that if you don&#8217;t own the invitation, you can&#8217;t edit it on the device. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m seeing on my iPhone right now.</p><p>As far as search is concerned, Chris Gavula is right. Contacts does have a search function. Calendar does not. Were you talking about the Global Address List (GAL); or were you talking about a search function for Calendar?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39789</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39789</guid> <description>While you are correct that calendar does not have a search function, you are incorrect - contacts DOES have a search function.  What I think you might mean is that you cannot search your Exchange GAL.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you are correct that calendar does not have a search function, you are incorrect &#8211; contacts DOES have a search function.  What I think you might mean is that you cannot search your Exchange GAL.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39788</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39788</guid> <description>I forgot to mention what, for me, is the single most frustrating part of this &quot;business&quot; phone, the absence of a search function for calendar and contacts. The beauty of an electronic PDA lies in the ease with which you can find dates and numbers: how on earth could Apple leave a search function out? (GoogleFind is only a partial fix).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention what, for me, is the single most frustrating part of this &#8220;business&#8221; phone, the absence of a search function for calendar and contacts. The beauty of an electronic PDA lies in the ease with which you can find dates and numbers: how on earth could Apple leave a search function out? (GoogleFind is only a partial fix).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39787</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:06:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39787</guid> <description>PocketInformant appears to be ready to launch for the iPhone: it will sync to its own database which will allow it (I hope) to correct these problems. I am having a problem which you do not mention, probably because you are not having it, but which I find very annoying: many of the appointments I create in Outlook (I sync wirelessly over Exchange) are not editable on the phone, because they come on as invitations (I have asked my guru, who uses an iphone, about it, but he doesn&#039;t understand why this is happening, do you?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PocketInformant appears to be ready to launch for the iPhone: it will sync to its own database which will allow it (I hope) to correct these problems. I am having a problem which you do not mention, probably because you are not having it, but which I find very annoying: many of the appointments I create in Outlook (I sync wirelessly over Exchange) are not editable on the phone, because they come on as invitations (I have asked my guru, who uses an iphone, about it, but he doesn&#8217;t understand why this is happening, do you?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrvlngDrew</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39779</link> <dc:creator>TrvlngDrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:39:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39779</guid> <description>I have to second you on this one Wayne, glad that Chris went thru the pain before I did.. Come to think of it, I ditched my iPhone 3G and got the new Treo Pro instead :-D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to second you on this one Wayne, glad that Chris went thru the pain before I did.. Come to think of it, I ditched my iPhone 3G and got the new Treo Pro instead <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/18/iphone-3g-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39776</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:46:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/09/17/the-iphone-3g-as-a-business-tool-part-2/#comment-39776</guid> <description>You hit the nail on the head Chris - with all these points.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head Chris &#8211; with all these points.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
