<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Motorola Q11 unveiled officially</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/10/09/motorola-q11-unveiled-officially/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/10/09/motorola-q11-unveiled-officially/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Christopher Gavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/10/09/motorola-q11-unveiled-officially/#comment-40044</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Gavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:56:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=14818#comment-40044</guid> <description>It&#039;s interesting.  Motorola chose to leave the processor speed out of their specs.  that usually means it&#039;s likely to be on the low end.
The fact that it only has 64MB of RAM and a 320 by 240 pixel screen also leads me to believe it&#039;s on the low end of things.
Hmmm.  I wonder who Motorola is trying to sell this thing to?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting.  Motorola chose to leave the processor speed out of their specs.  that usually means it&#8217;s likely to be on the low end.</p><p>The fact that it only has 64MB of RAM and a 320 by 240 pixel screen also leads me to believe it&#8217;s on the low end of things.</p><p>Hmmm.  I wonder who Motorola is trying to sell this thing to?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
