<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BlackBerry Storm Review Wrapup</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/20/blackberry-storm-review-wrapup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/20/blackberry-storm-review-wrapup/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/20/blackberry-storm-review-wrapup/#comment-40605</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:12:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=16620#comment-40605</guid> <description>I saw that review and wrote about it here:
http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/19/blackberry-storm-review-at-wsj-win-lose-or-draw/
Personally after I was done reading it, I was left wondering if Walt even used a phone to test. My guess is that someone from RIM walked him through a few demos.
To give one sentence about the multi-media capabilities of the phone?
Huh? This is a consumer device. One sentence?
The entire review read like a mini-feature shoot out between iPhone and Storm with very little independent analysis of the key reasons to buy one over the other.
For some crazy reason I think the best reviews are going to be the reports actual users make in howardforums and blackberryforums after they buy the phone on Friday.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that review and wrote about it here:</p><p><a
href="http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/19/blackberry-storm-review-at-wsj-win-lose-or-draw/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/19/blackberry-storm-review-at-wsj-win-lose-or-draw/</a></p><p>Personally after I was done reading it, I was left wondering if Walt even used a phone to test. My guess is that someone from RIM walked him through a few demos.</p><p>To give one sentence about the multi-media capabilities of the phone?</p><p>Huh? This is a consumer device. One sentence?</p><p>The entire review read like a mini-feature shoot out between iPhone and Storm with very little independent analysis of the key reasons to buy one over the other.</p><p>For some crazy reason I think the best reviews are going to be the reports actual users make in howardforums and blackberryforums after they buy the phone on Friday.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pradley</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/20/blackberry-storm-review-wrapup/#comment-40604</link> <dc:creator>pradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=16620#comment-40604</guid> <description>There is a very lengthy review by Walt Mossberg in this morning&#039;s WSJ: he describes a device with some nice features, but gives me (and possibly others) no reason to switch from an iphone. He is not telling anyone to run out and get one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very lengthy review by Walt Mossberg in this morning&#8217;s WSJ: he describes a device with some nice features, but gives me (and possibly others) no reason to switch from an iphone. He is not telling anyone to run out and get one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
