Posted on 26 February 2009, at 4:41 pm, by Judie Lipsett
If you could care less about fashion or peony imprinted netbooks, then you probably missed it. But buried in my report on my trip to New York for HP and Vivienne Tam’s Fashion Week events was a video of Sarah, an HP employee, performing webcam surgery on my special edition Mini Note’s camera.
Make no mistake about it: I am grateful to her for fixing the problem and for making my netbook’s webcam usable.
Joel at Geek.com happens to be a friend, so he took the time to read through the entire fashion-heavy trip report; he found the tutorial video and then posted about it.
SlashGear picked it up, followed by GottaBeMobile and then Engadget.
Granted, this DIY webcam surgery was never a perfect solution; performing repairs on your own device is risky if you are not comfortable and confident doing such things, and the possibility of voiding the warranty is ever present. But after watching Sarah go at it with gusto I was unafraid, and I suspect many others were as well.
Because my netbook was one of the early Vivienne Tam editions, I thought that this problem might have only affected a small number of special edition Mini Notes. It now turns out that this was a more widespread issue than I thought, with other HP Mini Notes (not only special editions) being affected as well – including Joel’s.
There have been online grumblings that HP was not acknowledging that there was a problem at all, with people thinking that it might be a driver issue. However, it turns out that the darkened webcam is the direct result of a block of nearly opaque film which covers the webcam. In all likelihood, this was a protective film placed on the webcam during the manufacturing process which should have been removed. But now it is nothing more than a manufacturing defect, and as such it is not something that the average person should fret over or have to try to fix on their own.
I thought it was great that Sarah provided a solution available for those adventurous few who weren’t afraid to crack their Mini Notes and take care of business, which is why I felt no trepidation about posting the video.
Needless to say, HP was not pleased. The video offered a fix for a problem that they had yet to acknowledge, and yes -Â there absolutely was a potential that if devices were damaged while performing the fix, the repairs would not be covered by HP’s warranty.
This afternoon I removed the video of Sarah’s fix at the request of HP, and I posted this statement in my original article:
At the request of HP, I have removed the video of the webcam fix.
There are two reasons why I opted to do so.
The first is that doing the fix could potentially damage the HP MiniNote, and it would also void the warranty.
The second is that I have been assured that because of this video, HP has been forced to acknowledge the “film over the webcam” issue, and they are putting together an official statement with plan of action to properly fix customer’s Mini Notes that are affected by this problem.
If you have any questions about my decision, send me an email.
Of course, the rest of the story is this:
The cat is now out of the bag. The ball is now in HP’s court, and we will all be watching closely to see how they handle themselves. My hope is that HP will do the honorable thing – acknowledge the issue and make sure that anyone who purchases an affected device can get theirs repaired quickly and for free. The other thing HP should do is make sure that future units will not be sold with the problem.
Time will tell.
Update added 03/02/09: Mike Cane made a comment below that I should have included a photographic comparison; he was right. Since I didn’t know that my Tam was going to be fixed until shortly before it happened, I didn’t think to get a “before” shot.
I have an “after” shot however, and I have asked Julie Strietelmeier to take a “before” shot with both her Tam and her regular Mini Note. I’ll post Julie’s photos later tonight.
Me in a meh lit room, after the webcam fix:

Lighting: ceiling fan with two fluorescent bulbs (admittedly not the best lighting)
Julie in a very well lit room, before the webcam fix:

Lighting: fluorescent overhead lights and fluorescent can lights on sides
Julie in a meh lit room, before the webcam fix:

Lighting: fluorescent can lights on sides only
Julie in a meh lit room, after the webcam fix:

Lighting: fluorescent can lights on sides only
No related posts.
@mikecane after picture posted – before picture coming. http://is.gd/lqbx
[...] used. like brand new,no scratches, keyboard tactile is still superb, main gripe is the video camera,see here. the specs, upgraded ram to 2gb. selling it at BNP $500 , MIN starting bid at $400. I can only [...]
[...] Despite I’m not a (heavy) webcam user there might be some concerns about the quality of the webcam in less-light-condictions. For me personally this is not a problem because I rarely use it, but it certainly is a problem noticed by different websites. A good article that summarizes the dynamics and probable cause of the problem is written by Judie Lipsett from GearDiary in ”An HP Mini Note Webcam Fix On the Way?” [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 27th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
I saw the video before it was removed and thought it was great. There did seem to be a pretty good chance of cracking something with the amount of space that had to be opened up at the top. I remember thinking to myself — why does she know how to do this so well….
Curious to see how widespread this issue is and whether a recall has to occur.
February 27th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
So of course we don't get any Before/After shots from this cam. Tch, tch! FAIL!
February 27th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Actually, I was under the impression that the very first time Sarah had cracked one and did the repair was that day – while we were waiting for her to verify that she could on another attendee's black Mini Note.
A small bit of paint or something fell into my case during the surgery; after I returned to my room I noticed it when the laptop was turned on and thought at first that it was a cluster of dead pixels, but it was just a bit of debris.
I was able easily to replicate Sarah's steps and blew the debris out. Cracking the case is actually very simple to do, and if you have a set like this one (http://www.geardiary.com/2008/11/03/holiday-gift-... ) you'd have the proper tools to safely do it.
February 28th, 2009 at 10:48 pm
There is a LONG post about this issue here, with ample documentation that it works.
http://myhpmini.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&...
March 2nd, 2009 at 6:07 am
Hi Gear Diary Readers,
Last week, many of you saw a video in which I removed a piece of film from the webcam on an HP Mini 1000 Vivienne Tam Edition. I would like to ask that you do not remove the film. What I did not know at the time was that the film was purposely placed there during production and it is important that it stays there. My intentions were good, but I do not want any of you to risk damaging your Mini or risk affecting the warranty. When using your webcam, pick a place that is well-lit to get the best possible picture. The Mini is a great value. If a high-performance webcam is important to you, you can find them on our full-featured (but higher-priced) notebook PCs or by choosing to add a webcam accessory.
I offered my apology to the gals with whom I spent time in NYC on Friday – I feel so bad for giving them incorrect information and I hope you all will accept my apology.
Sincerely,
Sarah
Product Marketing Manager, HP
March 2nd, 2009 at 2:03 pm
I totally understand that HP would not want customers to crack open their own laptops to perform this fix and possibly void their warranty, but saying that the film was "purposely placed there during production" raises more questions than it answers.
1. What purpose does the film provide?
2. Why does removing the film fix dim light issues?
Understandably, the Mini Note starts at just $450 or so, and it is a budget laptop. But HP put a webcam on it, so it only makes sense that people buying this series should be able to expect a usable webcam. No one is necessarily asking for high performance – they just want usable.
The Tam edition's MSRP starts at $699, and many of the people who buy one may or may not care that the webcam doesn't work properly, but those who do want to use the webcam are going to be sorely disappointed when they realize that can't find a spot in their home or Starbucks that is well lit enough to make them visible, much less look good.
If removing the film makes the camera more usable, then why was it put there there in the first place?
March 2nd, 2009 at 2:15 pm
You are correct that I dropped the ball on this.
Julie (http://www.the-gadgeteer.com) has both a Vivienne Tam edition like mine and a regular black Mini Note. She is going to get screensnaps of the webcam picture from each this evening. I will get a picture from mine.
Granted, this won't be as controlled a test as it would have been if I had all three laptops here together, but I think you will easily be able to see a significant difference.
With the film removed, the webcam on my Tam is as bright and usable as the ones on my Macbook Air and Macbook Pro.
March 6th, 2009 at 4:10 am
Hi there,
I happened to search this thread as I have been trying to find a solution to my dark built-in webcam (CQ40-340TU) of my newly bought HP laptop/notebook. (Tried updating the drivers, etc to no avail)
In my case, I bought a Compaq Presario Notebook last Tuesday (Mar 3) in a shop here in the Philippines and the webcam worked well while I was at the computer shop (as it was brightly lit up). When I got home, I was very surprised that it was very dark. I brought it to the HP service center on Mar 4 and they too agreed that it was not working well and suggested for unit replacement.
On Mar 5, I have a new unit , but the issue still persisted. I searched online and found out your article/advice and like your HP Mini, the laptop/notebook I bought also has an opaque film cover which makes the webcam unusable at indoors.
Just thought I share this as it seems that other HP models are also having this issue.
Thanks and regards,
Melchor
July 14th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
we purchased a compaq cq40-340tu last july 12, 2009 (philippines). the webcam was okay when we were still at the shop since it is well lighted, but back at home, it was really dark. i’ve seen this post before we even purchased the laptop but since we liked the specs of this unit, we still bought it. when i turn on the cam and the light beside it turns on, i can see a black paint-like on the glass of the cam from the inside as it is ot perfectly even. i just hope that HP will offer a fix on this to make it working fine. i know its just a .3mp cam but i sure do hope that it can be better once the fix is done.