<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The HTC Touch HD One Month Later</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Abbarbera</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-43471</link> <dc:creator>Abbarbera</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:00:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-43471</guid> <description>Dont forget bluetooth stereo h2dh. Some of us dont like wires I do like that it has a 3.5 jack hook up to my car home stereo or good headphones but riding a bike jogging or just working around the house stereo bluetooth with no wires is the way to go for stereo</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont forget bluetooth stereo h2dh. Some of us dont like wires I do like that it has a 3.5 jack hook up to my car home stereo or good headphones but riding a bike jogging or just working around the house stereo bluetooth with no wires is the way to go for stereo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Willy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42742</link> <dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:15:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42742</guid> <description>Judie.  Thanx so much for your advice.  The Maple is much like the Q.  The main reason to upgrade is more screen real estate.... so i do want a touch phone when the technology is mature. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judie.  Thanx so much for your advice.  The Maple is much like the Q.  The main reason to upgrade is more screen real estate&#8230;. so i do want a touch phone when the technology is mature.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie Lipsett</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42741</link> <dc:creator>Judie Lipsett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:39:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42741</guid> <description>My Advice: if you can wait, wait a little while longer. I think you would have a steeper period of adjustment going from the Motorola Q&#039;s candybar form factor with always available keyboard to a capacitive screen&#039;s virtual keyboard.
Even though the eye candy of the larger screen and updated operating system would almost make up for it, I think when you were answering texts or email you would regret the decision - unless you are really ready for a change.
Have you seen this?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=815&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=815&lt;/a&gt;
Mmmmmm...Maple! ;-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Advice: if you can wait, wait a little while longer. I think you would have a steeper period of adjustment going from the Motorola Q&#039;s candybar form factor with always available keyboard to a capacitive screen&#039;s virtual keyboard.</p><p>Even though the eye candy of the larger screen and updated operating system would almost make up for it, I think when you were answering texts or email you would regret the decision &#8211; unless you are really ready for a change.</p><p>Have you seen this?<br
/> <a
href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=815" target="_blank">http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=815</a></p><p>Mmmmmm&#8230;Maple! <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie Lipsett</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42739</link> <dc:creator>Judie Lipsett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:15:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42739</guid> <description>Good catch Chris! I didn&#039;t realize that Australia&#039;s Telstra had their own version with specs that would make it compatible with US 3G. Verrry Interesting! :-D </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch Chris! I didn&#039;t realize that Australia&#039;s Telstra had their own version with specs that would make it compatible with US 3G. Verrry Interesting! <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cgavula</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42737</link> <dc:creator>cgavula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:14:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42737</guid> <description>Okay,
Further clarification.
It appears there really are 2 versions of the Touch HD out there:
T8282 - Europe/Asia: 900/2100 MHz
T8285 - Australia (only Telstra) / US (Most Networks) : 850/2100 Mhz
So that would explain why Mitchell&#039;s unit supported the 850 UMTS band.  So U.S.  buyers should look for the T8285! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay,</p><p>Further clarification.</p><p>It appears there really are 2 versions of the Touch HD out there:</p><p>T8282 &#8211; Europe/Asia: 900/2100 MHz<br
/> T8285 &#8211; Australia (only Telstra) / US (Most Networks) : 850/2100 Mhz</p><p>So that would explain why Mitchell&#039;s unit supported the 850 UMTS band.  So U.S.  buyers should look for the T8285!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Willy</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42734</link> <dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:51:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42734</guid> <description>Hmmmm. Now that Verizon is about to release the original Diamond we have an interesting choice. My main objection to the Diamond was the lack of a card slot. That&#8217;s now moot. Bit concerned about the touch on the 2.8&#8243; keyboard. If we get it now in 2 years can upgrade again (if rules don&#8217;t change). Otherwise its 6 to 9 months for the Diamond 2 or Whitestone (HD successor) in the US. From the review, sounds like i should keep the ole Motorola Q for a while....   I&#039;m hoping they release these subsidized at the US $200 price point to really compete with iPhone.  BTW - great review guys. Suggestions? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm. Now that Verizon is about to release the original Diamond we have an interesting choice. My main objection to the Diamond was the lack of a card slot. That&rsquo;s now moot. Bit concerned about the touch on the 2.8&Prime; keyboard. If we get it now in 2 years can upgrade again (if rules don&rsquo;t change). Otherwise its 6 to 9 months for the Diamond 2 or Whitestone (HD successor) in the US. From the review, sounds like i should keep the ole Motorola Q for a while&#8230;.   I&#039;m hoping they release these subsidized at the US $200 price point to really compete with iPhone.  BTW &#8211; great review guys. Suggestions?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drew</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42726</link> <dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42726</guid> <description>WoW!  Sounds like quite the phone despite the STAGGERING cost..   I think, for the same price I can almost buy 2 new HTC Shifts now..  :-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW!  Sounds like quite the phone despite the STAGGERING cost..   I think, for the same price I can almost buy 2 new HTC Shifts now.. <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gorkon</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-42721</link> <dc:creator>gorkon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-42721</guid> <description>Great review guys.  I remember when we all wanted PocketPC&#039;s with a large screen.  This looks like a pretty good phone even with the flaws. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review guys.  I remember when we all wanted PocketPC&#039;s with a large screen.  This looks like a pretty good phone even with the flaws.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Judie Lipsett</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/03/07/the-htc-touch-hd-one-month-later/#comment-69521</link> <dc:creator>Judie Lipsett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:50:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=20847#comment-69521</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Touch HD review is up! :-) http://is.gd/mgxF&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Touch HD review is up! <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <a
href="http://is.gd/mgxF" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/mgxF</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
