<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: App Store&#8230; Monopoly Or Sour Grapes?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/16/app-store-monopoly-or-sour-grapes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/16/app-store-monopoly-or-sour-grapes/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: bluemonq</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/16/app-store-monopoly-or-sour-grapes/#comment-47091</link> <dc:creator>bluemonq</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:26:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38128#comment-47091</guid> <description>Remember folks, a monopoly is not illegal. *Abusing* monopoly status is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember folks, a monopoly is not illegal. *Abusing* monopoly status is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Cohen</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/16/app-store-monopoly-or-sour-grapes/#comment-47081</link> <dc:creator>Dan Cohen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38128#comment-47081</guid> <description>yeah, this was one of those articles I read with my head shaking the entire time</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, this was one of those articles I read with my head shaking the entire time</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jkj1962</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/16/app-store-monopoly-or-sour-grapes/#comment-47080</link> <dc:creator>jkj1962</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:35:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38128#comment-47080</guid> <description>Monopoly?  Ridiculous.  If the iPhone was the only phone you could get on AT&amp;T?  Still ridiculous.  Too many other carriers, too many other phones.
I understand Apple&#039;s desire to &quot;control&quot; the apps that can or can not be installed on an iPhone.  The more control they have, the less likely an ill-behaved apps will crash the phone.  They are simply trying to provide the best customer experience possible.  It seems they&#039;re doing a pretty good job of it.
Granted, Apple&#039;s approval process seems to be broken, but I suspect part of the problem is the sheer volume of submissions for approval.  Everyone and their brother, sister, uncle, aunt and third-cousin twice-removed is writing iPhone apps.
This is no different to RIM&#039;s Blackberry App Store, or Nokia&#039;s, or other planned &quot;App Stores&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monopoly?  Ridiculous.  If the iPhone was the only phone you could get on AT&amp;T?  Still ridiculous.  Too many other carriers, too many other phones.</p><p>I understand Apple&#8217;s desire to &#8220;control&#8221; the apps that can or can not be installed on an iPhone.  The more control they have, the less likely an ill-behaved apps will crash the phone.  They are simply trying to provide the best customer experience possible.  It seems they&#8217;re doing a pretty good job of it.</p><p>Granted, Apple&#8217;s approval process seems to be broken, but I suspect part of the problem is the sheer volume of submissions for approval.  Everyone and their brother, sister, uncle, aunt and third-cousin twice-removed is writing iPhone apps.</p><p>This is no different to RIM&#8217;s Blackberry App Store, or Nokia&#8217;s, or other planned &#8220;App Stores&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
