<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Should This App Have Been Approved?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/22/should-this-app-have-been-approved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/22/should-this-app-have-been-approved/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Michael Anderson</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/22/should-this-app-have-been-approved/#comment-47257</link> <dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38923#comment-47257</guid> <description>If you look at movies and video games, having content rated separately and making the producer liable to provide &#039;worst case&#039; samples is a solid approach, and would move Apple away from the &#039;content police&#039; role.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at movies and video games, having content rated separately and making the producer liable to provide &#8216;worst case&#8217; samples is a solid approach, and would move Apple away from the &#8216;content police&#8217; role.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carly Z</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/22/should-this-app-have-been-approved/#comment-47254</link> <dc:creator>Carly Z</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:45:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38923#comment-47254</guid> <description>Agreed. I think Apple should scrap the approval process for everything and just keep it as a &quot;technical vetting&quot;...as long as it works as advertised and doesn&#039;t crash the system then leave it alone.
It seems like Apple is so terrified of being sued over the App Store they&#039;re choking the life out of it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I think Apple should scrap the approval process for everything and just keep it as a &#8220;technical vetting&#8221;&#8230;as long as it works as advertised and doesn&#8217;t crash the system then leave it alone.</p><p>It seems like Apple is so terrified of being sued over the App Store they&#8217;re choking the life out of it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Anderson</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/07/22/should-this-app-have-been-approved/#comment-47253</link> <dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:55:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=38923#comment-47253</guid> <description>I think the app approval process is broken and way too subjective ... almost moralistic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the app approval process is broken and way too subjective &#8230; almost moralistic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
