<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wired.com Head-To-Head Leaves Me Scratching Mine&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/17/wired-com-head-to-head-leaves-me-scratching-mine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/17/wired-com-head-to-head-leaves-me-scratching-mine/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: palmsolo</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/17/wired-com-head-to-head-leaves-me-scratching-mine/#comment-49567</link> <dc:creator>palmsolo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:25:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=48538#comment-49567</guid> <description>Hey, they both came out about the same time and have FM radios :)
I actually bought both, but I compared my iPod nano to my old nano and the Zune 4GB, which is a much more comparable take on the device. As you said, the iPod touch is the most comparable to the Zune HD.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, they both came out about the same time and have FM radios <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>I actually bought both, but I compared my iPod nano to my old nano and the Zune 4GB, which is a much more comparable take on the device. As you said, the iPod touch is the most comparable to the Zune HD.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
