<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Opinion &#8211; How Realistic is a Sprint with T-Mobile Merger?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: justmac32</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-50102</link> <dc:creator>justmac32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:22:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-50102</guid> <description>How about slowly migrating the sprint base to GSM as they mature past contract dates, while pushing the CDMA network towards MVNO&#039;s. The Clearwire WiMax could be converted to LTE which T-Mobile would use as their main data technology. Also, all the MVNO&#039;s could have a open network to operate (CDMA) on. Then T-Mobile can capitalize on both the Prime customers on GSM from Sprint and the revenue from the customer traffic the MVNO&#039;s pay for on CDMA.
Would the Feds go for this?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about slowly migrating the sprint base to GSM as they mature past contract dates, while pushing the CDMA network towards MVNO&#8217;s. The Clearwire WiMax could be converted to LTE which T-Mobile would use as their main data technology. Also, all the MVNO&#8217;s could have a open network to operate (CDMA) on. Then T-Mobile can capitalize on both the Prime customers on GSM from Sprint and the revenue from the customer traffic the MVNO&#8217;s pay for on CDMA.</p><p>Would the Feds go for this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Perry</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-49938</link> <dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:20:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-49938</guid> <description>I think nosmohtac has it right: LTE is the answer that would make this merger possible.  Although Sprint has committed to WiMax with Clearwire, they could still fairly easily change to LTE, or commit to both; WiMax in urban areas and LTE elsewhere.  I&#039;m not an expert on the technologies, so I don&#039;t know if running both necessarily makes sense.
The point is that they could continue running CDMA and GSM and whatever it is the Nextel phones are running (I don&#039;t remember what it&#039;s called) for the time being, while working to converge the networks on the 4G standard.  Personally, as a Sprint customer, I&#039;m a little leery of their plans to go with WiMax considering that Verizon and AT&amp;T and most of the rest of the world are going with LTE.  WiMax sounds like it could be technological evolutionary dead-end.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think nosmohtac has it right: LTE is the answer that would make this merger possible.  Although Sprint has committed to WiMax with Clearwire, they could still fairly easily change to LTE, or commit to both; WiMax in urban areas and LTE elsewhere.  I&#8217;m not an expert on the technologies, so I don&#8217;t know if running both necessarily makes sense.</p><p>The point is that they could continue running CDMA and GSM and whatever it is the Nextel phones are running (I don&#8217;t remember what it&#8217;s called) for the time being, while working to converge the networks on the 4G standard.  Personally, as a Sprint customer, I&#8217;m a little leery of their plans to go with WiMax considering that Verizon and AT&amp;T and most of the rest of the world are going with LTE.  WiMax sounds like it could be technological evolutionary dead-end.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nosmohtac</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-49865</link> <dc:creator>nosmohtac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:56:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-49865</guid> <description>I think this would be an awesome merger. It just makes sense. I don&#039;t know how they would tackle the technology difference, but it doesn&#039;t seem unsurmountable.
There have already been tests with LTE (seen as GSM tech.)handing off to CDMA for voice, which is what VZW is supposedly going with. Add to that the Clearwire recently stated that if WiMax doesn&#039;t pick up enough support around the world that they can switch (to LTE I assume) with only a software upgrade.
There are already phones on VZW, Alltel(yes they&#039;re still around in some markets), and Sprint that have GSM radios, meant for world business travelers. Wouldn&#039;t it be possible to have OEM&#039;s manufacture phones that have CDMA and GSM Radios that support T-mo&#039;s frequencies? I&#039;m not sure, but I would love to see this happen. T-mobile and Sprint don&#039;t have the widest coverage, but they have the most competitively priced post-paid plans out there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this would be an awesome merger. It just makes sense. I don&#8217;t know how they would tackle the technology difference, but it doesn&#8217;t seem unsurmountable.</p><p>There have already been tests with LTE (seen as GSM tech.)handing off to CDMA for voice, which is what VZW is supposedly going with. Add to that the Clearwire recently stated that if WiMax doesn&#8217;t pick up enough support around the world that they can switch (to LTE I assume) with only a software upgrade.</p><p>There are already phones on VZW, Alltel(yes they&#8217;re still around in some markets), and Sprint that have GSM radios, meant for world business travelers. Wouldn&#8217;t it be possible to have OEM&#8217;s manufacture phones that have CDMA and GSM Radios that support T-mo&#8217;s frequencies? I&#8217;m not sure, but I would love to see this happen. T-mobile and Sprint don&#8217;t have the widest coverage, but they have the most competitively priced post-paid plans out there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stevenshytle</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-49856</link> <dc:creator>stevenshytle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-49856</guid> <description>While Sprint is a cellphone company I believe they sold off all their cellular towers. Switching tower technologies is a lease arrangement now.  Also the new Sprint HTC Touch Pro 2 while it is a CDMA phone I think it has a worldband GSM slot also.  Seems like a transition could happen with proper planning.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Sprint is a cellphone company I believe they sold off all their cellular towers. Switching tower technologies is a lease arrangement now.  Also the new Sprint HTC Touch Pro 2 while it is a CDMA phone I think it has a worldband GSM slot also.  Seems like a transition could happen with proper planning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Anderson</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-49853</link> <dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-49853</guid> <description>Whew ... as someone who had Nextel during the merger, you had me going for a minute there ...!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew &#8230; as someone who had Nextel during the merger, you had me going for a minute there &#8230;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/09/23/opinion-how-realistic-is-a-sprint-with-t-mobile-merger/#comment-49851</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=49557#comment-49851</guid> <description>Well Sprint figured out how integrate Nextel pretty well. What makes you think they couldn&#039;t do the same with T-Mo.
That was a joke - just in case.
Yeah, this would be a disaster -- if there&#039;s one lesson to be learned from prior cellular conversions is that incompatible core technology will be almost an insurmountable hurdle.
Also, I think Virgin&#039;s already owned by Sprint and was always renting space on their network so I am not sure the prepaid would flood them -- but trying to integrate T-Mo might capsize them...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Sprint figured out how integrate Nextel pretty well. What makes you think they couldn&#8217;t do the same with T-Mo.</p><p>That was a joke &#8211; just in case.</p><p>Yeah, this would be a disaster &#8212; if there&#8217;s one lesson to be learned from prior cellular conversions is that incompatible core technology will be almost an insurmountable hurdle.</p><p>Also, I think Virgin&#8217;s already owned by Sprint and was always renting space on their network so I am not sure the prepaid would flood them &#8212; but trying to integrate T-Mo might capsize them&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
