<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Updated Western Digital WD TV Live Network HD Media Player &#8211; $120</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/12/updated-western-digital-wd-tv-live-network-hd-media-player-120/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/12/updated-western-digital-wd-tv-live-network-hd-media-player-120/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BBusyb</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/12/updated-western-digital-wd-tv-live-network-hd-media-player-120/#comment-50411</link> <dc:creator>BBusyb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:21:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53339#comment-50411</guid> <description>Its an interesting Update.
I Have the Original player, and while I like it, Having network access could make it an ideal device.
How it handles access to network drives, and how it supports streaming is going to be key, especially when you compare it to other products in the market, like the Popcorn Hour, etc.
WD&#039;s name is definitely going to make a difference, as is the ease of use, and from experience of using the Original Media Player whose interface was pretty easy to use, but not perfect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its an interesting Update.</p><p>I Have the Original player, and while I like it, Having network access could make it an ideal device.</p><p>How it handles access to network drives, and how it supports streaming is going to be key, especially when you compare it to other products in the market, like the Popcorn Hour, etc.</p><p>WD&#8217;s name is definitely going to make a difference, as is the ease of use, and from experience of using the Original Media Player whose interface was pretty easy to use, but not perfect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wayne Schulz</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/12/updated-western-digital-wd-tv-live-network-hd-media-player-120/#comment-55623</link> <dc:creator>Wayne Schulz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:57:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53339#comment-55623</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Updated Western Digital WD TV Live Network HD Media Player – $120 http://ff.im/-9G2Ze&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Updated Western Digital WD TV Live Network HD Media Player – $120 <a
href="http://ff.im/-9G2Ze" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-9G2Ze</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
