<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Marathoner D-Qed for using iPod</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/</link> <description>Everyone can understand technology; sometimes it just takes a little translating.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: stagen</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/#comment-50469</link> <dc:creator>stagen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53654#comment-50469</guid> <description>Yeah , i find this pretty dumb considering its a closed course.
I use this app to listen to music while I run all the time and its great.
The app is called Cadence, it matches the music from your itunes library to the speed you are running at, helps motivate me and keep my pace.
http://www.cadenceapp.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah , i find this pretty dumb considering its a closed course.</p><p>I use this app to listen to music while I run all the time and its great.</p><p>The app is called Cadence, it matches the music from your itunes library to the speed you are running at, helps motivate me and keep my pace.</p><p><a
href="http://www.cadenceapp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cadenceapp.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Perry</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/#comment-50438</link> <dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:49:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53654#comment-50438</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been a runner, a marathoner, specifically, and I can understand the safety reasons for not wearing headphones during a run. But usually, that applies more to practice runs where the ability to hear traffic is very important.  During an official race, the course is usually closed, so the safety issue, in my mind, becomes less important.
Personally, I always prefered to run with friends and to maintain a conversation during runs, but when I run alone, I almost always do it with music.
I guess it&#039;s a good thing I&#039;m FAR from an elite runner!  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a runner, a marathoner, specifically, and I can understand the safety reasons for not wearing headphones during a run. But usually, that applies more to practice runs where the ability to hear traffic is very important.  During an official race, the course is usually closed, so the safety issue, in my mind, becomes less important.</p><p>Personally, I always prefered to run with friends and to maintain a conversation during runs, but when I run alone, I almost always do it with music.</p><p>I guess it&#8217;s a good thing I&#8217;m FAR from an elite runner! <img
src='http://www.geardiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Bradbury</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/#comment-56983</link> <dc:creator>Alex Bradbury</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53654#comment-56983</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Marathoner D-Qed for usig iPod &#124; Gear Diary http://bit.ly/FekGW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Marathoner D-Qed for usig iPod | Gear Diary <a
href="http://bit.ly/FekGW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/FekGW</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: doogald</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/#comment-50432</link> <dc:creator>doogald</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53654#comment-50432</guid> <description>I am a runner. While I understand the logic behind the ban, and I support its ban among the elite runners eligible for prizes, I personally disagree with it for the rest of the pack in the race.
For the elite, the iPod could contain information, pacing and, perhaps, even real-time communication with a coach, and I can support its ban. For the non-elite, however, I do not understand the logic that says an iPod is disallowed because it impairs a runner, while deaf runners, blind runners - who would have the same exact impairments - are not prevented from running (blind runners typically do have guides, but not always - the elite runner Marla Runyon ran both track and road races without a guide at times.)
This ban, of course, is in place due to fear of lawsuits that come after a runner using an iPod is injured in one of the ways that the USATF and the organizers (and their insurers) fear. But all runners sign a legal waiver when they enter a race. Add the stuff that the race organizers will not be responsible for injuries caused by the use of electronic devices that could impair a runner to the waiver, that&#039;s what I say.
I do run in races that ban iPods, etc. and do not use them in these races. (Well, I actually use the Nike+ stuff without headphones - i.e., just to capture the running data for the race, not to listen to music, with the iPod in a pocket and nothing in my ears.) As a matter of fact, I&#039;m finding that listening to anything during a race is hard to do without cranking the volume, so I just do not bother in the races I&#039;ve run in the last 18 months, even when they are not prohibited. But I think that if somebody needs to listen to whatever it is that motivates them to finish, it&#039;s not harming anybody to let them use the devices.
By the way, to me, it is the responsibility of the passing runner to find a path, not the runner being passed to allow somebody through. That&#039;s not a valid reason to ban them, in my opinion. (Yes, I have been occasionally frustrated by being boxed in at the start of events. But so it goes - that&#039;s part of the race.)
So, again, I agree with a ban on championship competitors - put on an electronic device of any sort and you are automatically in the pack - but not for the pack.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a runner. While I understand the logic behind the ban, and I support its ban among the elite runners eligible for prizes, I personally disagree with it for the rest of the pack in the race.</p><p>For the elite, the iPod could contain information, pacing and, perhaps, even real-time communication with a coach, and I can support its ban. For the non-elite, however, I do not understand the logic that says an iPod is disallowed because it impairs a runner, while deaf runners, blind runners &#8211; who would have the same exact impairments &#8211; are not prevented from running (blind runners typically do have guides, but not always &#8211; the elite runner Marla Runyon ran both track and road races without a guide at times.)</p><p>This ban, of course, is in place due to fear of lawsuits that come after a runner using an iPod is injured in one of the ways that the USATF and the organizers (and their insurers) fear. But all runners sign a legal waiver when they enter a race. Add the stuff that the race organizers will not be responsible for injuries caused by the use of electronic devices that could impair a runner to the waiver, that&#8217;s what I say.</p><p>I do run in races that ban iPods, etc. and do not use them in these races. (Well, I actually use the Nike+ stuff without headphones &#8211; i.e., just to capture the running data for the race, not to listen to music, with the iPod in a pocket and nothing in my ears.) As a matter of fact, I&#8217;m finding that listening to anything during a race is hard to do without cranking the volume, so I just do not bother in the races I&#8217;ve run in the last 18 months, even when they are not prohibited. But I think that if somebody needs to listen to whatever it is that motivates them to finish, it&#8217;s not harming anybody to let them use the devices.</p><p>By the way, to me, it is the responsibility of the passing runner to find a path, not the runner being passed to allow somebody through. That&#8217;s not a valid reason to ban them, in my opinion. (Yes, I have been occasionally frustrated by being boxed in at the start of events. But so it goes &#8211; that&#8217;s part of the race.)</p><p>So, again, I agree with a ban on championship competitors &#8211; put on an electronic device of any sort and you are automatically in the pack &#8211; but not for the pack.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carly Z</title><link>http://www.geardiary.com/2009/10/13/marathoner-d-qed-for-usig-ipod/#comment-50430</link> <dc:creator>Carly Z</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geardiary.com/?p=53654#comment-50430</guid> <description>I&#039;m a pretty casual runner and don&#039;t stretch myself beyond 5ks (yet), but from my perspective this is ridiculous. The iPod didn&#039;t run for her, it didn&#039;t make her muscles hurt less or her lungs work better, so dq&#039;ing her over it is pretty harsh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a pretty casual runner and don&#8217;t stretch myself beyond 5ks (yet), but from my perspective this is ridiculous. The iPod didn&#8217;t run for her, it didn&#8217;t make her muscles hurt less or her lungs work better, so dq&#8217;ing her over it is pretty harsh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
