Attack of the Mobile Ads

Posted on 17 January 2010 by


I started my GPS today as I headed out the door, and it tried to sell me tires from Sears (the GPS, not the door). This is not the first time my GPS has tried to offer me things; previously it has hawked the Olive Garden’s manicotti, followed by a hotel room at the Best Western (I think my GPS was implying I am a cheap date).

YouTube Preview Image

Meanwhile, Techcrunch reported this week about an ad built into the NPR app that let you customize a Vampire Weekend music video. The gimmick of the app was that it uses the iPhone’s accelerometer, so to make changes you shake your phone. Cool and kind of fun, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s just another ad.


And the upcoming Skiff reader, designed to showcase newspapers and magazines, will feature not only the ads already built into the content, but also local ads. Not to mention Apple’s sudden interest in mobile advertising, as seen by their purchase of Quattro Wireless. Plus there are a few rumors flying around that publishers are thinking about ways to insert ads into ebooks to support the $9.99 pricepoint that seems to have become the benchmark.

When did the world become “Pay less, be bombarded with ads forever”? It seems as though the mobile tech world has decided that if prices and margins are being squeezed by lower price points, they’ll find new ways to monetize us. The difference is that there’s a huge difference between slashing prices by 20% and selling advertising space in perpetuity.

I think what really bugs me is that there’s little to no way to avoid these ads. In the case of the Skiff Reader, it seems they’ve built ads into their business model. The NPR app does not, as far as I know, offer a premium ad-free version. My GPS is very concerned that I know where to find the nearest cheap italian food, but I don’t have any control over what it suggests, or how to opt out of it.

Let’s be realistic; companies need to make money, and there’s generally downward pricing pressure, especially in technology. At the same time, the answer isn’t to squeeze everything into banner ads, context ads, local ads, national ads, ads in ads…we’re all adults and we understand how businesses need profits. Why not offer us a “premium” version, that promises no ads, versus the “ad-supported” versions that are partially or fully subsidized by advertising. The App Store and the Android Marketplace both offer these kinds of options, and the nice thing is it gives the consumer choice, rather than turning them into a captive audience for more advertising dollars.

What do you think? Are you getting sick of seeing ads everywhere? Sound off below!

This post was written by:

- who has written 925 posts on Gear Diary.

Carly has been a gadget fiend for a long time, going back to her first PDA (a Palm M100). She quickly went from researching what PDA to buy to following tech news closely and keeping up with the latest and greatest stuff. She loves writing about ebooks because they combine her two favorite activities; reading anything and everything, and talking about fun new tech toys. What could be better?

Contact the author


  • Pingback: Gadget Freaks

  • http://www.geardiary.com Douglas Moran

    I think there should *not* be ads in books, ever. If I have to pay a bit more so that my books can be ad free, so be it.

    On the other hand, with apps in general–particularly games–I’m okay with there being a free version *with* ads, and a pay version without. If paying $1 gets me no ads–PaperToss has a version with ads for free, and a version with ads that costs $0.99–that’s fine by me. It gives me a chance to try the ads, and if I like it, hey, I’ll pay.

    Some online ‘zines have similar models. For example, you can read Salon.com for free with ads, but if you pay, like, $35/year, you get it without ads. That works for me so long as the price is reasonable. (Why more newspapers haven’t tried this model is beyond me, honestly. They seem very binary–pay wall, or no pay wall. How about “no advantages for free, but if you pay a subscription fee, there are advantages”? Don’t these idiots have *any* imagination?)

    But with books, no, absolutely not. I think this whole thing is a way that publishers have come up with in order to avoid having to change their current–and now completely obsolete and outdated–model. I have a few old paperbacks that have ads in the middle of them, too; as we know, it never caught on, did it?

  • Pingback: Allistair Lee

  • Pingback: Mburu Wambui

  • http://www.geardiary.com Michael Anderson

    Actually, the secondary ad market for electronic media is just getting warmed up, Doug! Video games are definitely all over it. Play a racing game and expect to see ads on billboards. Same with Tiger Woods Golf or the new Olympics game.

    And that is AFTER you have paid ~$40 – $60 for the game!

  • http://www.geardiary.com Douglas Moran

    Well, I don’t mind product placement in reasonable places, or if it’s done sarcastically, like Adam Sandler in “Happy Gilmore.” But then you get stupid stuff, like a thing of deodorant on the laboratory bench in an episode of “Eureka”, and it’s absurd.

    But the news above that you’ll essentially have ads on top of other ads in the Skiff pretty much convinces me not to buy it.